Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 49/49

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Inkling-Small leads Iceman Contributor by 8.4 points on StealthMark, 27.6 to 19.2. It leads on 6 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Iceman Contributor on 3. Inkling-Small scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Full datasheets, every price and sourceInkling-Small ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
Inkling-Small
The sphere's apparent floor support, separate dark feature and broad paint ordering justify partial state credit. The major weakness is the largely missing mirror system: isolated side images and faint floor echoes do not establish repeated virtual rooms or curved spherical mapping. Downward framing, the oversized frontal panel, unresolved paint transport and satin surface appearance remain distinct limitations.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 14.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 3.0/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 8.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
Inkling-Small
The faces and dripping caps communicate a cute mushroom scene, but simple construction and weak spatial relationships limit the result. The defining foot-stamping action is unresolved, the flattering portrait is smaller than its painter, and the requested material contrasts are only partly conveyed.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
Inkling-Small
A recognizable but rudimentary Mona Lisa interpretation. Facial shading and subdued colors provide coherence, while the frontal blocklike torso, unresolved wrists, fingerless hands and shallow landscape substantially limit likeness, construction and finish.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
Inkling-Small
A recognizable sunset beach with a clear focal sun and appealing color transitions. Connected fish silhouettes and layered scenery establish basic coherence. Primitive figures, ambiguous recreation, sparse descriptive detail and weak grounding limit construction and depth. The aligned reflection supplies a useful lighting cue, but shadows and material effects remain underdeveloped.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Inkling-Small
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
Inkling-Small
Recognizable animals, readable accessories and an appealing sunset support a coherent basic cartoon. Rounded construction leaves joints, riding support and steering unresolved. Decorative gradients contribute atmosphere, but directional lighting, distinct materials and convincing water displacement are weakly demonstrated.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
Inkling-Small
The pelican is immediately recognizable, and its sweeping neck, shaped bill and orderly spokes provide character. Riding remains only partially realized: legs, pedal engagement, steering and seat support cannot be read confidently. Controlled graphic effects add atmosphere, but simplified construction and weak grounding keep the result basic.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.