Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads Iceman Contributor by 1.6 points on StealthMark, 20.8 to 19.2. It leads on 5 of 9 benchmarks, including Foresight, and Iceman Contributor on 3, with 1 tied. Iceman Contributor scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores higher on StealthMark and runs 12× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceQwen3.6-35B-A3B ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
The artwork demonstrates rounded volume, recognizable paint colors and a compact black feature at an appropriate screen height. The enlarged main-sphere framing, unsupported crimson and cyan interaction histories, oversized compact paint balls and largely missing mirror structure remain substantial weaknesses. The core assessment is 20/170; with no demonstrated floor damage, the combined assessment remains 20/180.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 2.5/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 4.0/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 3.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
An appealing fantasy illustration with coordinated ornament, readable suspension and luminous turquoise accents. Plausible limb attachments and soft shading support competent execution. Bear-like proportions, unclear paw gestures, insufficient white robe fabric, crowded chest details and shallow material modeling limit its finish.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A recognizable but basic geometric interpretation. Muted colors and soft shading provide cohesion, while weak likeness, unresolved hands, rigid anatomy and shallow landscape construction substantially limit the replication.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A recognizable beach sunset with balanced framing and appealing color transitions. Birds, boats and small animals fulfill the main scene requirements. Elementary anatomy, faint details, weak grounding and rigid reflection columns limit depth and finish.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Clean shapes, cheerful faces and bright colors make the riding arrangement readable. The dog does not visibly operate the control, while awkward limbs, shallow hull placement and stiff poses limit credibility. Gradients and layered foam add modest volume and motion. The obscured tail attachment does not establish detachment.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A cheerful, readable illustration with a distinctive pelican silhouette, clean contours and an orderly landscape. Soft glow and restrained shading provide modest atmosphere. Construction is weaker: the handlebar is disconnected, wings do not reach the controls, and overlapping legs leave pedaling ambiguous. Simple forms and mostly flat materials limit depth and drawing sophistication.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.