Gemma 4 31B 30.2/100Rank 29/49

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Inkling-Small leads Gemma 4 31B by 1.8 points on StealthMark, 27.6 to 25.8. It leads on 6 of 9 benchmarks, including Latch, and Gemma 4 31B on 2, with 1 tied. Inkling-Small scores higher on Ground Truth.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Inkling-Small scores higher on StealthMark and takes 4× more context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemma 4 31B ↗Inkling-Small ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Gemma 4 31B
The sphere's volume, separate airborne black blob and vertical color ordering are readable. The large, low sphere, plain surrounding planes and absent nested optical imagery leave the central geometric and reflection requirements unsupported. Paint contact and transport remain unresolved. Material credit recognizes the visible convex shading, highlights and distinct surface colors while retaining deductions for the schematic finish and oversized blobs.
Inkling-Small
The sphere's apparent floor support, separate dark feature and broad paint ordering justify partial state credit. The major weakness is the largely missing mirror system: isolated side images and faint floor echoes do not establish repeated virtual rooms or curved spherical mapping. Downward framing, the oversized frontal panel, unresolved paint transport and satin surface appearance remain distinct limitations.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 11.0/25 | 14.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 3.0/15 | 3.0/15 |
| Reflections | 0.0/120 | 8.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 5.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Gemma 4 31B
A clean, appealing luminous mascot with coherent body continuity and a readable jar-hugging pose. Rounded highlights, smooth gradients and balanced framing work well. The teardrop silhouette, modest eyes and nearly even grin only partly satisfy the character brief; sparse jar construction and simple geometry limit sophistication.
Inkling-Small
The faces and dripping caps communicate a cute mushroom scene, but simple construction and weak spatial relationships limit the result. The defining foot-stamping action is unresolved, the flattering portrait is smaller than its painter, and the requested material contrasts are only partly conveyed.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
Gemma 4 31B
A small luminous creature proudly holding an empty glass jar tests expression, transparent materials and the balance of character and prop.
Inkling-Small
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Gemma 4 31B
The portrait is recognizable through its silhouette, palette and smile, with clean execution of simple shapes. Replication remains weak: the face and pose differ markedly, hands become fingerless ovals, clothing lacks construction, and the landscape loses its atmospheric detail. Basic gradients provide limited volume.
Inkling-Small
A recognizable but rudimentary Mona Lisa interpretation. Facial shading and subdued colors provide coherence, while the frontal blocklike torso, unresolved wrists, fingerless hands and shallow landscape substantially limit likeness, construction and finish.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Gemma 4 31B
A coherent beach illustration with clean silhouettes, a sweeping shoreline and an effective sunset palette. Requested subjects are recognizable, but primitive animal construction, sparse detail, unsupported palm placement and schematic reflections limit drawing sophistication and physical credibility.
Inkling-Small
A recognizable sunset beach with a clear focal sun and appealing color transitions. Connected fish silhouettes and layered scenery establish basic coherence. Primitive figures, ambiguous recreation, sparse descriptive detail and weak grounding limit construction and depth. The aligned reflection supplies a useful lighting cue, but shadows and material effects remain underdeveloped.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Gemma 4 31B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Inkling-Small
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Gemma 4 31B
Clean, simple silhouettes communicate a raccoon riding on a dog. Limited animal specificity, absent steering controls and a flat platform weaken the requested scene. Small facial marks provide purposeful detail, while unresolved support, flat lighting and schematic water restrict physical coherence. Primitive but coherent construction supports basic drawing quality.
Inkling-Small
Recognizable animals, readable accessories and an appealing sunset support a coherent basic cartoon. Rounded construction leaves joints, riding support and steering unresolved. Decorative gradients contribute atmosphere, but directional lighting, distinct materials and convincing water displacement are weakly demonstrated.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 1.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Gemma 4 31B
A clean, readable illustration with balanced placement and coherent basic geometry. The sky gradient and ground shadow establish diffuse illumination. Primitive shapes and sparse detail limit artistry, while unclear leg attachment, missing pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the riding action.
Inkling-Small
The pelican is immediately recognizable, and its sweeping neck, shaped bill and orderly spokes provide character. Riding remains only partially realized: legs, pedal engagement, steering and seat support cannot be read confidently. Controlled graphic effects add atmosphere, but simplified construction and weak grounding keep the result basic.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.