Glyph Cluster 6.4/100Rank 46/49

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Inkling-Small leads Glyph Cluster by 8.7 points on StealthMark, 27.6 to 18.9. It leads on 6 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Glyph Cluster on 3. Inkling-Small scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Full datasheets, every price and sourceInkling-Small ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Glyph Cluster
Rounded sphere volume, compact colored forms and crimson-below-cyan ordering provide limited agreement. The visible paint does not establish the required interaction history, the sphere and black blob are displaced from the prescribed projection, and most of the defining mirror-room structure is missing or unresolved. The faint reflection echoes earn limited optical credit.
Inkling-Small
The sphere's apparent floor support, separate dark feature and broad paint ordering justify partial state credit. The major weakness is the largely missing mirror system: isolated side images and faint floor echoes do not establish repeated virtual rooms or curved spherical mapping. Downward framing, the oversized frontal panel, unresolved paint transport and satin surface appearance remain distinct limitations.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 5.0/25 | 14.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 3.0/15 | 3.0/15 |
| Reflections | 8.0/120 | 8.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Glyph Cluster
A charming palette and three expressive companions make the concept recognizable. The dominant paper enclosure overwhelms the small group, the plum character lacks a clear brace silhouette, and the cuddle remains difficult to trace. Sparse furnishings, ambiguous folds and generalized shading limit the promised lived-in richness and tactile depth.
Inkling-Small
The faces and dripping caps communicate a cute mushroom scene, but simple construction and weak spatial relationships limit the result. The defining foot-stamping action is unresolved, the flattering portrait is smaller than its painter, and the requested material contrasts are only partly conveyed.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
Glyph Cluster
Punctuation-shaped companions gather inside a curled paper home. The scene tests expressive silhouettes, close interaction and the coherence of a detailed miniature environment.
Inkling-Small
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Glyph Cluster
The portrait has a continuous body silhouette, attached sleeves and hands, and simple landscape depth. Its oversized pale head enclosure nearly erases the expression, while separated fists, ochre clothing and frontal construction weaken Mona Lisa likeness. Sparse detail, flat materials and ambiguous facial layers leave the drawing seriously unresolved.
Inkling-Small
A recognizable but rudimentary Mona Lisa interpretation. Facial shading and subdued colors provide coherence, while the frontal blocklike torso, unresolved wrists, fingerless hands and shallow landscape substantially limit likeness, construction and finish.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 0.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 1.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 1.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 0.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 1.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Glyph Cluster
A cheerful, recognizable beach illustration with playful accessories and mostly clean silhouettes. Sunset colors and soft glow supply atmosphere, but abbreviated anatomy, unexplained airborne animals, weak ground contact and absent water reflections limit physical coherence. Small details add interest without consistently resolving construction or materials.
Inkling-Small
A recognizable sunset beach with a clear focal sun and appealing color transitions. Connected fish silhouettes and layered scenery establish basic coherence. Primitive figures, ambiguous recreation, sparse descriptive detail and weak grounding limit construction and depth. The aligned reflection supplies a useful lighting cue, but shadows and material effects remain underdeveloped.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Glyph Cluster
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Inkling-Small
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Glyph Cluster
Recognizable animals and clean shapes give the scene charm, but the requested steering action is visibly incomplete. Simplified joints, weak vehicle construction and uncertain water contact limit physical coherence. Flat lighting, sparse functional detail and a small focal group keep the illustration basic despite its tidy edges.
Inkling-Small
Recognizable animals, readable accessories and an appealing sunset support a coherent basic cartoon. Rounded construction leaves joints, riding support and steering unresolved. Decorative gradients contribute atmosphere, but directional lighting, distinct materials and convincing water displacement are weakly demonstrated.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Glyph Cluster
A readable cartoon with open framing, aligned bicycle wheels and modest atmospheric effects. Pelican likeness is approximate, while the narrow neck, crowded feet, absent steering contact and unclear drivetrain weaken the riding action. Clean shapes help presentation, but shallow space and inconsistent shading limit the finish.
Inkling-Small
The pelican is immediately recognizable, and its sweeping neck, shaped bill and orderly spokes provide character. Riding remains only partially realized: legs, pedal engagement, steering and seat support cannot be read confidently. Controlled graphic effects add atmosphere, but simplified construction and weak grounding keep the result basic.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.