STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Muse Wonder vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Muse Wonder leads GLM-5.3-Flash by 8.2 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 48.8. It leads on 5 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and GLM-5.3-Flash on 4. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
Model guide ↗

Overall StealthMark

57.0/100Overall rank 10/53
48.8/100Overall rank 19/53

General Intelligence

53.1/100
42.2/100

Visual Intelligence

64.0/100
59.4/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

Local modelOpen model · MIT

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Muse Wonder
  • GLM-5.3-Flash
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 6.4× faster in our speed test. GLM-5.3-Flash is 40× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Muse Wonder
  • GLM-5.3-Flash
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Muse Wonder: $20$4 inputGLM-5.3-Flash: $0.5040× cheaper$0.15 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Muse Wonder: 1MTiedGLM-5.3-Flash: 1MTied131K max output
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Muse Wonder: 5706.4× fastertokens/sGLM-5.3-Flash: 89tokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Muse Wonder: Not disclosedGLM-5.3-Flash: 320B18B active
Developer
MetaZ.AI
Released
12 Oct 202626 Aug 2026
Origin
United StatesNot published
Input → output
Text, image, video, audio, PDF → textText, image → text
Architecture
Not publishedHybrid sparse and linear attention MoE

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗GLM-5.3-Flash ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

GLM-5.3-Flash 49.0/100Rank 27/472 of 3 levels

2 of 3 played
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 316 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderGLM-5.3-Flash
Level 1Second Thoughts
16 ptsOut of lives
9 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
10 ptsOut of lives
Pending
Level 3Hide or Flight
11 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

GLM-5.3-Flash 4.0/100Rank 48/483 of 5 levels

3 of 5 played
Latch: complete playing field
Level 30.6 ptsTurn 33 / 36

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderGLM-5.3-Flash
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
4.4 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsFinished early
Level 3Relay vault
18.8 ptsCleared
0.6 ptsFinished early
Level 4Passing bay
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Pending
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
Not played

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

GLM-5.3-Flash

The setup is recognizable, but the paint interaction remains poorly established and off-center. The first wall and floor images provide coherent placement, scale, silhouette and occlusion cues, with faint lower echoes. Missing receding chains, nested imagery and ordered emitter mappings leave the reflection system heavily simplified. Dull shading does not convincingly depict polished steel or mirrors.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderGLM-5.3-Flash
State at 600 ms22.0/2514.0/25
Camera and placement12.0/159.0/15
Reflections21.5/12021.5/120
Materials and scale7.5/103.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

GLM-5.3-Flash

The expressive emerald face, ivory horns, gold accents and fine veining closely match the brief. Rounded volumes and layered shading create an appealing mascot. Rear hoof placement is cramped, lighting is somewhat inconsistent, and conspicuous white patches behind the muzzle interrupt the finish. Surfaces remain visibly stylized rather than photographic.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderGLM-5.3-Flash
Task & likeness7.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/107.5/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/108.0/10
Purposeful detail7.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/107.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

GLM-5.3-Flash

A rounded jade bull raising a hoof tests anatomy, balance and the appearance of polished stone and metal.

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

GLM-5.3-Flash

The crossed arms, green dress and hazy landscape clearly evoke Mona Lisa. Replication is limited by the frontal pose, oversized eyes, elongated face and pronounced lips. Overlapping finger strips lack convincing knuckles and palm volume. The balanced framing and soft shading provide cohesion, but simplified anatomy, repetitive folds and blurred scenery keep the portrait basic.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderGLM-5.3-Flash
Task & likeness5.5/104.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/104.5/10
Space & placement5.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/105.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/104.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

GLM-5.3-Flash

Framing palms, a vivid sunset palette and balanced kite and umbrella create an appealing beach illustration. Layered water and shoreline give the scene depth, while aligned reflections reinforce the sunset. Small accessories add character and reward inspection. Figures and animals remain schematic, some overlaps are difficult to read, and simplified shadows and flat surfaces limit physical richness.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderGLM-5.3-Flash
Task & likeness8.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/107.0/10
Space & placement6.5/108.0/10
Light & reflections6.5/108.0/10
Purposeful detail9.0/108.0/10
Artistry & character7.0/108.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

GLM-5.3-Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

GLM-5.3-Flash

Recognizable animals, a supported riding pose and an energetic diagonal composition make the scene readable. Character details and spray strengthen its appeal. Simple limb construction, limited directional lighting and an unresolved steering connection constrain the drawing's physical precision and complexity.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderGLM-5.3-Flash
Task & likeness7.5/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/105.0/10
Space & placement6.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections4.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail7.5/106.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/104.0/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/106.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

GLM-5.3-Flash

The pelican, bicycle and seaside setting form a clear, appealing illustration. Circular wheels, readable frame tubes and clean silhouettes support the action. The legs connect to the body, but the far foot's pedal contact and wing-to-handlebar junction are cramped. Simple shading, uniform wave marks and limited surface texture keep the rendering relatively flat.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderGLM-5.3-Flash
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/107.5/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail8.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character7.5/108.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.