MiniMax M3.1 Flash 30.7/100Rank 28/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads MISSINGNO. by 7.2 points on StealthMark, 45.9 to 38.7. It leads on 6 of the 7 benchmarks with results for both and MISSINGNO. on 1. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


MiniMax M3.1 Flash
The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.
MISSINGNO.
The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.
| Category | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | MISSINGNO. |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 20.0/25 | 19.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 10.0/15 | 7.0/15 |
| Reflections | 24.0/120 | 12.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 8.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


MiniMax M3.1 Flash
The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.
MISSINGNO.
An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.
| Category | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | MISSINGNO. |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.
MISSINGNO.
A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.
MISSINGNO.
Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.
| Category | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | MISSINGNO. |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.
MISSINGNO.
A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.
| Category | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | MISSINGNO. |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


MiniMax M3.1 Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MISSINGNO.
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


MiniMax M3.1 Flash
An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.
MISSINGNO.
The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.
| Category | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | MISSINGNO. |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 9.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 8.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.
MISSINGNO.
A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.
| Category | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | MISSINGNO. |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.