Inkling-Small 30.2/100Rank 29/49

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Wonder leads Inkling-Small by 29.4 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 27.6. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceInkling-Small ↗Muse Wonder ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Inkling-Small
The sphere's apparent floor support, separate dark feature and broad paint ordering justify partial state credit. The major weakness is the largely missing mirror system: isolated side images and faint floor echoes do not establish repeated virtual rooms or curved spherical mapping. Downward framing, the oversized frontal panel, unresolved paint transport and satin surface appearance remain distinct limitations.
Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 14.0/25 | 22.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 3.0/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 8.0/120 | 21.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Inkling-Small
The faces and dripping caps communicate a cute mushroom scene, but simple construction and weak spatial relationships limit the result. The defining foot-stamping action is unresolved, the flattering portrait is smaller than its painter, and the requested material contrasts are only partly conveyed.
Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Inkling-Small
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Inkling-Small
A recognizable but rudimentary Mona Lisa interpretation. Facial shading and subdued colors provide coherence, while the frontal blocklike torso, unresolved wrists, fingerless hands and shallow landscape substantially limit likeness, construction and finish.
Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Inkling-Small
A recognizable sunset beach with a clear focal sun and appealing color transitions. Connected fish silhouettes and layered scenery establish basic coherence. Primitive figures, ambiguous recreation, sparse descriptive detail and weak grounding limit construction and depth. The aligned reflection supplies a useful lighting cue, but shadows and material effects remain underdeveloped.
Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Inkling-Small
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Inkling-Small
Recognizable animals, readable accessories and an appealing sunset support a coherent basic cartoon. Rounded construction leaves joints, riding support and steering unresolved. Decorative gradients contribute atmosphere, but directional lighting, distinct materials and convincing water displacement are weakly demonstrated.
Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Inkling-Small
The pelican is immediately recognizable, and its sweeping neck, shaped bill and orderly spokes provide character. Riding remains only partially realized: legs, pedal engagement, steering and seat support cannot be read confidently. Controlled graphic effects add atmosphere, but simplified construction and weak grounding keep the result basic.
Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.