Inkling-Small 30.2/100Rank 29/49

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads Inkling-Small by 17.0 points on StealthMark, 44.6 to 27.6. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including Latch, and Inkling-Small on 2, including Foresight. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on Beach, with its largest category advantage in anatomy & construction.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceInkling-Small ↗MiMo-V2.6-Flash ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Inkling-Small
The sphere's apparent floor support, separate dark feature and broad paint ordering justify partial state credit. The major weakness is the largely missing mirror system: isolated side images and faint floor echoes do not establish repeated virtual rooms or curved spherical mapping. Downward framing, the oversized frontal panel, unresolved paint transport and satin surface appearance remain distinct limitations.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The faint lower sphere image provides limited reflection evidence through reversed paint-color ordering. The wider reflection system and nested room imagery are absent. The colored beads do not resolve the required impact and transport history, while displaced paint positions and weak material rendering further limit the result.
| Category | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 14.0/25 | 5.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 3.0/15 | 4.5/15 |
| Reflections | 8.0/120 | 6.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 2.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Inkling-Small
The faces and dripping caps communicate a cute mushroom scene, but simple construction and weak spatial relationships limit the result. The defining foot-stamping action is unresolved, the flattering portrait is smaller than its painter, and the requested material contrasts are only partly conveyed.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The centered rabbit has an appealing alert expression, a balanced silhouette, and a restrained technological palette. Outfit panels and orbital accents are cleanly resolved. The orb-holding paw has an ambiguous grip, the ears lack distinct angular bends, and the halo's interlocking construction is unclear. Soft shading suggests volume, but materials and spatial depth remain simplified.
| Category | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Inkling-Small
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Inkling-Small
A recognizable but rudimentary Mona Lisa interpretation. Facial shading and subdued colors provide coherence, while the frontal blocklike torso, unresolved wrists, fingerless hands and shallow landscape substantially limit likeness, construction and finish.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The dark clothing, long hair, folded hands and hazy landscape make the reference recognizable. Replication is limited by the frontal symmetry, elongated face, wide staring eyes and downturned mouth. Both arms connect to the hands, but the overlapping palms and looplike fingers are poorly resolved. Soft facial shading provides some volume; the clothing and landscape remain broad, simplified shapes.
| Category | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Inkling-Small
A recognizable sunset beach with a clear focal sun and appealing color transitions. Connected fish silhouettes and layered scenery establish basic coherence. Primitive figures, ambiguous recreation, sparse descriptive detail and weak grounding limit construction and depth. The aligned reflection supplies a useful lighting cue, but shadows and material effects remain underdeveloped.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The warm sunset, aligned reflection, framing palms and playful beach animals create an appealing, coherent scene. Small toys and shells remain readable. Drawing is simplified: animals have limited volume, water uses repetitive horizontal strokes, and foreground shadows do not consistently follow the central sun. Clean execution supports a competent illustration, but depth and material rendering remain modest.
| Category | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Inkling-Small
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Inkling-Small
Recognizable animals, readable accessories and an appealing sunset support a coherent basic cartoon. Rounded construction leaves joints, riding support and steering unresolved. Decorative gradients contribute atmosphere, but directional lighting, distinct materials and convincing water displacement are weakly demonstrated.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The raccoon riding the dog reads clearly, with expressive faces and a cheerful waterscape. The steering action is weak: no paw reaches the handlebar, which meets the dog's muzzle. The vehicle resembles a thin board with a steering post. Overlapping limbs obscure anatomy, while limited shadows, reflections and surface modeling keep the scene flat.
| Category | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Inkling-Small
The pelican is immediately recognizable, and its sweeping neck, shaped bill and orderly spokes provide character. Riding remains only partially realized: legs, pedal engagement, steering and seat support cannot be read confidently. Controlled graphic effects add atmosphere, but simplified construction and weak grounding keep the result basic.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The pelican is immediately recognizable, with an expressive eye and prominent pouch, and the landscape provides clear framing. Clean outlines and spokes support the cheerful illustration. Both feet visibly miss the bicycle's pedal mechanism, weakening the riding action. Simplified machinery, shallow depth and loosely directional shading limit the requested masterpiece quality.
| Category | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.