Inkling-Small 30.2/100Rank 29/49

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Kimi K3 leads Inkling-Small by 23.0 points on StealthMark, 50.6 to 27.6. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Kimi K3 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceInkling-Small ↗Kimi K3 ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Inkling-Small
The sphere's apparent floor support, separate dark feature and broad paint ordering justify partial state credit. The major weakness is the largely missing mirror system: isolated side images and faint floor echoes do not establish repeated virtual rooms or curved spherical mapping. Downward framing, the oversized frontal panel, unresolved paint transport and satin surface appearance remain distinct limitations.
Kimi K3
The room fills the complete portrait frame without visible borders or labels. The main sphere and airborne black are convincingly placed within the portrait frame. Paint ordering is supported, but its contact and transport history remains weakly expressed. Symmetric wall ghosts, inverted floor imagery and panel echoes establish a basic mirror system. Diffuse gradients dominate, with little ordered nested imagery or repeated emitter mapping on either planar or spherical surfaces. The wall images sit too low, and the floor image is unusually large and low.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 14.0/25 | 18.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 3.0/15 | 8.0/15 |
| Reflections | 8.0/120 | 24.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 2.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Inkling-Small
The faces and dripping caps communicate a cute mushroom scene, but simple construction and weak spatial relationships limit the result. The defining foot-stamping action is unresolved, the flattering portrait is smaller than its painter, and the requested material contrasts are only partly conveyed.
Kimi K3
The indigo creature and warm reflected counterpart create a balanced, contemplative composition. Equations, constellations and book emblems give the transformation meaning. Clean silhouettes and controlled glow support the scene, but minimally articulated legs, shallow spatial cues and smooth, generalized surfaces limit its anatomical and material richness.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Inkling-Small
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Kimi K3
An imagined creature encounters its reflection. The scene tests original character design, visual self-interpretation and the relationship between a subject and its reflected image.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Inkling-Small
A recognizable but rudimentary Mona Lisa interpretation. Facial shading and subdued colors provide coherence, while the frontal blocklike torso, unresolved wrists, fingerless hands and shallow landscape substantially limit likeness, construction and finish.
Kimi K3
The centered portrait, dark veil, folded hands and misty landscape clearly evoke Mona Lisa. Replication is limited by the elongated neck, simplified facial proportions and oval hands with shallow finger marks. Soft shading gives some volume, but pervasive blur substitutes for controlled painterly transitions and precise detail.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Inkling-Small
A recognizable sunset beach with a clear focal sun and appealing color transitions. Connected fish silhouettes and layered scenery establish basic coherence. Primitive figures, ambiguous recreation, sparse descriptive detail and weak grounding limit construction and depth. The aligned reflection supplies a useful lighting cue, but shadows and material effects remain underdeveloped.
Kimi K3
A coordinated sunset palette, expressive silhouettes and varied small details create a lively, appealing beach illustration. The central sun and framing palm and umbrella organize the busy scene, with clean contours preserving readability. Bodies and people remain diagrammatic, depth is shallow, and inverted figure reflections cross matte-looking sand without convincing surface lighting. Materials and movement are mostly conveyed through flat shapes.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Inkling-Small
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Kimi K3
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Inkling-Small
Recognizable animals, readable accessories and an appealing sunset support a coherent basic cartoon. Rounded construction leaves joints, riding support and steering unresolved. Decorative gradients contribute atmosphere, but directional lighting, distinct materials and convincing water displacement are weakly demonstrated.
Kimi K3
The raccoon rides on the dog's back, and the dog's paw meets a steering assembly connected to the red hull. Expressive faces, a warm sunset and sweeping spray create an appealing composition. Crowded body overlaps obscure some limb connections, and the raccoon's right ear appears slightly separated. Flat shading and stylized reflections limit volume and depth.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Inkling-Small
The pelican is immediately recognizable, and its sweeping neck, shaped bill and orderly spokes provide character. Riding remains only partially realized: legs, pedal engagement, steering and seat support cannot be read confidently. Controlled graphic effects add atmosphere, but simplified construction and weak grounding keep the result basic.
Kimi K3
The pelican and bicycle are immediately recognizable, with an expressive bill, flowing scarf and cheerful composition. Both legs remain attached, but pedal connections and wing contact with the handlebar are weakly resolved. Wheel alignment and landscape layers are coherent. Clean outlines support the illustration, while flat surfaces and limited lighting keep it short of masterful execution.
| Category | Inkling-Small | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.