Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Mistral Large 4 leads Iceman Contributor by 24.1 points on StealthMark, 43.3 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Mistral Large 4 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on StealthMark and runs 3.3× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMistral Large 4 ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
Mistral Large 4
The central sphere, airborne black and deformed crimson support substantial state and placement credit. Recent cyan contact and crimson transport remain uncertain. Sparse wall patches and glossy gradients provide little evidence of the required extensive mirror system, while the missing centerline lamp and bulky crimson remain visible weaknesses.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 17.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 11.0/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 12.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
Mistral Large 4
An appealing, coherent illustration whose enormous rounded cat anchors the windblown composition. Warm shading and floating sketches communicate the brief well. Simplified paws, faint ear construction, inconsistent wind cues and limited material texture keep the execution below exceptional.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Mistral Large 4
A heavy ginger cat stays planted on a terrace as wind carries papers around it. The scene tests weight, expression and the contrast between stable and moving forms.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
Mistral Large 4
A recognizable, cleanly rendered interpretation with a restrained palette and some facial modeling. Its enlarged frontal head, simplified expression, compressed low hands and schematic landscape substantially limit likeness and construction. The smooth rendering does not reproduce the painting's nuanced anatomy, clothing or atmospheric depth.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
Mistral Large 4
A clean, appealing beach illustration with clear subject coverage, a cohesive sunset palette and expressive animal details. Bodies and accessories resolve basic construction coherently, although joints remain schematic. Layered shapes establish modest depth; generic oval shadows and flat surfaces limit physical richness. Repeated forms and sparse articulation leave room for more accomplished drawing.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Mistral Large 4
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
Mistral Large 4
The central interaction is clear, with recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent sunset composition. Clean contours and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Simplified joints, uncertain steering attachment, shallow hull volume and limited directional lighting constrain its physical resolution.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
Mistral Large 4
A coherent, appealing pelican illustration with a continuous body silhouette, readable bicycle and grounded wheels. Simplified legs and ambiguous steering and pedal connections limit construction. Clean shapes and expressive accessories succeed, while shallow depth, modest lighting and sparse material differentiation leave substantial room for refinement.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.