Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads Iceman Contributor by 26.7 points on StealthMark, 45.9 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 20.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 10.0/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 24.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.