STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Iceman Contributor vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads Iceman Contributor by 26.7 points on StealthMark, 45.9 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

19.2/100Overall rank 47/53
45.9/100Overall rank 24/53

General Intelligence

11.7/100
35.8/100

Visual Intelligence

31.0/100
62.6/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Iceman Contributor
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

  • Iceman Contributor
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Other models
  • Median
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Iceman Contributor: Not publishedMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1M
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Iceman Contributor: 46tokens/sMiniMax M3.1 Flash: Not measured
SizeTotal and active parameters
Iceman Contributor: Not disclosedMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 428B23B active
Developer
Not publishedMiniMax
Input → output
Not publishedText, image, video → text
Architecture
Not publishedMixture-of-Experts with MiniMax Sparse Attention and native multimodal encoder

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 31 ptsTurn 7 / 20

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 30.7/100Rank 28/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelIceman ContributorMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Level 1Second Thoughts
0 ptsOut of lives
6 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
3 ptsOut of lives
5 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
1 ptsOut of lives
9 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Iceman Contributor 3.6/100Rank 44/48

Cleared 1 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 55 ptsTurn 25 / 40

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 21.9/100Rank 38/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 517.2 ptsTurn 24 / 40

Points per level

LevelIceman ContributorMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
2.8 ptsFinished early
8.6 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 3Relay vault
2.2 ptsFinished early
5 ptsOut of turns
Level 4Passing bay
4 ptsFinished early
4.4 ptsFinished early
Level 5Second thoughts
5 ptsFinished early
17.2 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMiniMax M3.1 Flash
State at 600 ms0.5/2520.0/25
Camera and placement2.5/1510.0/15
Reflections7.5/12024.0/120
Materials and scale3.0/108.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness4.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.0/106.0/10
Space & placement4.0/107.0/10
Light & reflections4.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/105.0/10
Artistry & character4.5/106.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/107.0/10
Visual integrity4.0/106.0/10

Benchmark task

Iceman Contributor

Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness1.5/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction1.5/104.5/10
Space & placement2.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections2.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail2.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character2.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects2.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity3.0/105.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness7.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.5/107.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/106.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/108.0/10
Artistry & character3.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/106.5/10
Visual integrity5.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Different task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness2.0/109.0/10
Anatomy & construction3.0/108.0/10
Space & placement3.0/108.0/10
Light & reflections4.0/106.0/10
Purposeful detail3.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character2.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects4.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity2.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness4.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.5/106.5/10
Space & placement3.5/108.0/10
Light & reflections5.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail4.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character3.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects4.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.