Grok 4.7 72.6/100Rank 3/49

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Grok 4.7 leads Inkling-Small by 19.6 points on StealthMark, 47.2 to 27.6. It leads on 8 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Inkling-Small on 1. Grok 4.7 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Grok 4.7 scores higher on StealthMark. Inkling-Small takes 2.1× more context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceGrok 4.7 ↗Inkling-Small ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Grok 4.7
Some sphere reflections are correctly placed, with useful size progression and a floor image. Their overlapping side continuations and inverted floor paint order provide additional local optical cues. The gross paint sequence is recognizable, although crimson is a little too low. Incorrect lamp projections and absent nested and receding imagery still leave the mirror system largely incomplete.
Inkling-Small
The sphere's apparent floor support, separate dark feature and broad paint ordering justify partial state credit. The major weakness is the largely missing mirror system: isolated side images and faint floor echoes do not establish repeated virtual rooms or curved spherical mapping. Downward framing, the oversized frontal panel, unresolved paint transport and satin surface appearance remain distinct limitations.
| Category | Grok 4.7 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 23.0/25 | 14.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 12.5/15 | 3.0/15 |
| Reflections | 26.0/120 | 8.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 6.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Grok 4.7
The bold spiral dominates an appealing, restrained silhouette, with crisp angular turns and subtle charcoal highlights. However, a visible background gap separates the shell from the body, making the shell appear suspended. The connected head and delicate eye stalks read clearly, while shading and small features remain simple.
Inkling-Small
The faces and dripping caps communicate a cute mushroom scene, but simple construction and weak spatial relationships limit the result. The defining foot-stamping action is unresolved, the flattering portrait is smaller than its painter, and the requested material contrasts are only partly conveyed.
| Category | Grok 4.7 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
Grok 4.7
A dark snail with a geometric spiral shell tests silhouette, curved construction and restrained material shading.
Inkling-Small
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Grok 4.7
Dark clothing, overlapping hands and a restrained smile make the reference recognizable. The broad frontal face, elongated neck and oversized head weaken likeness and anatomical proportion; rounded hands lack convincing fingers. Gentle facial shading suggests volume, while clothing and landscape remain flat. Angular veil overlaps and a hard horizontal background boundary weaken the finish.
Inkling-Small
A recognizable but rudimentary Mona Lisa interpretation. Facial shading and subdued colors provide coherence, while the frontal blocklike torso, unresolved wrists, fingerless hands and shallow landscape substantially limit likeness, construction and finish.
| Category | Grok 4.7 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 1.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Grok 4.7
The warm sunset, blue water and scattered beach activities create a cheerful, readable composition. Animals and equipment use basic silhouettes, with limited anatomical detail and grounding. The sun reflection forms a rigid tapered strip, and foreground objects lack cast shadows. Clean shapes support the illustration, but depth, materials and drawing complexity remain modest.
Inkling-Small
A recognizable sunset beach with a clear focal sun and appealing color transitions. Connected fish silhouettes and layered scenery establish basic coherence. Primitive figures, ambiguous recreation, sparse descriptive detail and weak grounding limit construction and depth. The aligned reflection supplies a useful lighting cue, but shadows and material effects remain underdeveloped.
| Category | Grok 4.7 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Grok 4.7
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Inkling-Small
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Grok 4.7
The raccoon rides clearly on the dog's back, and expressive faces, bright colors and a readable orange hull create a playful composition. Steering is unresolved: the dog's visible paws rest on the deck rather than grasping the controls. Simple body shapes and ribbonlike wake limit construction and movement. The glowing sun produces little corresponding illumination or reflection.
Inkling-Small
Recognizable animals, readable accessories and an appealing sunset support a coherent basic cartoon. Rounded construction leaves joints, riding support and steering unresolved. Decorative gradients contribute atmosphere, but directional lighting, distinct materials and convincing water displacement are weakly demonstrated.
| Category | Grok 4.7 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Grok 4.7
The pelican reads clearly through its long bill, throat pouch and curved neck. Clean pastel shapes and balanced scenery make an appealing illustration. The riding mechanism is less convincing: feet lack clear pedal contact, steering is unresolved, and the frame lacks a coherent drivetrain. Simple shading and sparse feather detail limit depth and finish.
Inkling-Small
The pelican is immediately recognizable, and its sweeping neck, shaped bill and orderly spokes provide character. Riding remains only partially realized: legs, pedal engagement, steering and seat support cannot be read confidently. Controlled graphic effects add atmosphere, but simplified construction and weak grounding keep the result basic.
| Category | Grok 4.7 | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.