STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

GPT-6.1 Terra leads Qwen3.6-35B-A3B by 39.6 points on StealthMark, 60.4 to 20.8. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Terra scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

60.4/100Overall rank 9/54
20.8/100Overall rank 47/54

General Intelligence

58.0/100
12.7/100

Visual Intelligence

64.9/100
34.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

Local modelOpen model · Apache-2.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • GPT-6.1 Terra
  • Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

GPT-6.1 Terra scores higher on StealthMark. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is 3.4× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1.05M tokens of context.

  • GPT-6.1 Terra
  • Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
GPT-6.1 Terra: $5$1 inputQwen3.6-35B-A3B: $1.493.4× cheaper$0.25 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1.05MTied128K max outputQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 1.01MTied64K max output
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
GPT-6.1 Terra: Not measuredQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 577tokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
GPT-6.1 Terra: Not disclosedQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 35B3B active
Developer
OpenAIQwen
Released
26 Oct 202616 Apr 2026
Origin
United StatesChina
Input → output
Text, image → textText, image, video → text
Architecture
Not publishedMoE causal language model with vision encoder; Gated DeltaNet + gated attention; 256 experts, 8 routed + 1 shared active

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGPT-6.1 Terra ↗Qwen3.6-35B-A3B ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

GPT-6.1 Terra 62.0/100Rank 9/50

Survived 2 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 315 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 20.7/100Rank 42/50

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Level 1Second Thoughts
21 ptsSurvived
4 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
9 ptsOut of lives
3 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
15 ptsSurvived
9 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

GPT-6.1 Terra 77.7/100Rank 12/51

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 3.6/100Rank 47/51

Cleared 1 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 57.8 ptsTurn 36 / 40

Points per level

LevelGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
1 ptsOut of turns
Level 3Relay vault
19.2 ptsCleared
0.2 ptsFinished early
Level 4Passing bay
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
3 ptsOut of turns
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
7.8 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

GPT-6.1 Terra

The sphere, airborne black and first reflected silhouettes preserve important geometry within the portrait frame. Paint deformation, contact order and forward transport are supported, with a small crimson endpoint overshoot. Major optical omissions dominate: short finite reflection sequences and smooth bands replace extensive, spatially ordered mirror imagery. Dark gloss and crisp upper emitter shapes provide partial material credit.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

The artwork demonstrates rounded volume, recognizable paint colors and a compact black feature at an appropriate screen height. The enlarged main-sphere framing, unsupported crimson and cyan interaction histories, oversized compact paint balls and largely missing mirror structure remain substantial weaknesses. The core assessment is 20/170; with no demonstrated floor damage, the combined assessment remains 20/180.

Score breakdown

CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.6-35B-A3B
State at 600 ms23.0/252.5/25
Camera and placement11.0/154.0/15
Reflections33.0/1203.5/120
Materials and scale7.5/102.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

GPT-6.1 Terra

A balanced serpent emblem with six attached outward heads, delicate scales and softly rounded bodies. Its compact silhouette reads clearly, but central routing does not establish every alternating crossing or crisp inward corner. Repetitive texture, limited facial anatomy and weak contact shadows constrain its organic character.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

An appealing fantasy illustration with coordinated ornament, readable suspension and luminous turquoise accents. Plausible limb attachments and soft shading support competent execution. Bear-like proportions, unclear paw gestures, insufficient white robe fabric, crowded chest details and shallow material modeling limit its finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness7.5/106.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail6.5/106.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/106.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity6.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

GPT-6.1 Terra

A pale serpent woven into an interlocking knot tests connected anatomy, repeated structure and readable overlaps. Organic surface detail must work with the overall geometry.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

GPT-6.1 Terra

A recognizable interpretation with developed facial shading, shaped sleeve folds and purposeful small features. These strengths support modest upward calibration, while the frontal torso, elongated proportions, schematic finger joints and unresolved seated support keep replication and construction uneven.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A recognizable but basic geometric interpretation. Muted colors and soft shading provide cohesion, while weak likeness, unresolved hands, rigid anatomy and shallow landscape construction substantially limit the replication.

Score breakdown

CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness5.5/102.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/101.0/10
Space & placement4.5/102.0/10
Light & reflections6.5/100.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/101.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/101.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/101.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/102.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

GPT-6.1 Terra

A coherent sunset illustration with clear prompt fulfillment, controlled framing and varied, purposeful small details. Simplified joints, frontal staging, flattened animal forms and weakly directional shadows limit its anatomical, spatial and physical sophistication.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A recognizable beach sunset with balanced framing and appealing color transitions. Birds, boats and small animals fulfill the main scene requirements. Elementary anatomy, faint details, weak grounding and rigid reflection columns limit depth and finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness8.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/104.5/10
Space & placement6.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/104.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/104.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity7.5/105.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

GPT-6.1 Terra

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

GPT-6.1 Terra

A coherent cartoon with expressive animals, readable steering and a clear wake. Fine facial and hull details reward inspection. The main limits are the boatlike craft, simplified joints, weakly braced frontal raccoon and minimal directional lighting or material depth.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Clean shapes, cheerful faces and bright colors make the riding arrangement readable. The dog does not visibly operate the control, while awkward limbs, shallow hull placement and stiff poses limit credibility. Gradients and layered foam add modest volume and motion. The obscured tail attachment does not establish detachment.

Score breakdown

CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness6.5/104.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/103.5/10
Space & placement6.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/103.5/10
Purposeful detail7.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/104.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/103.5/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

GPT-6.1 Terra

A coherent pelican cyclist with expressive proportions, purposeful feather detail and developed bicycle machinery. Continuous body contours, aligned wheels and readable pedal contacts support the scene. Simplified articulation, shallow modelling and an unresolved steering connection limit construction and placement.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A cheerful, readable illustration with a distinctive pelican silhouette, clean contours and an orderly landscape. Soft glow and restrained shading provide modest atmosphere. Construction is weaker: the handlebar is disconnected, wings do not reach the controls, and overlapping legs leave pedaling ambiguous. Simple forms and mostly flat materials limit depth and drawing sophistication.

Score breakdown

CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness7.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/103.5/10
Space & placement6.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail7.0/107.0/10
Artistry & character6.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects5.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity6.0/104.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.