STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Gemini 4 Argon leads Qwen3.6-35B-A3B by 46.6 points on StealthMark, 67.4 to 20.8. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

67.4/100Overall rank 5/53
20.8/100Overall rank 46/53

General Intelligence

63.6/100
12.7/100

Visual Intelligence

74.4/100
34.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

Local modelOpen model · Apache-2.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on StealthMark. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is 6.7× cheaper per output token and runs 4× faster in our speed test. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Gemini 4 Argon: $10$2 inputQwen3.6-35B-A3B: $1.496.7× cheaper$0.25 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Gemini 4 Argon: 1MTied1M max outputQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 1.01MTied64K max output
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Gemini 4 Argon: 144tokens/sQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 5774× fastertokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Gemini 4 Argon: Not disclosedQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 35B3B active
Developer
GoogleQwen
Released
13 Oct 202616 Apr 2026
Origin
United StatesChina
Input → output
Text, image, audio, video, PDF → textText, image, video → text
Architecture
Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) transformer with native multimodal inputsMoE causal language model with vision encoder; Gated DeltaNet + gated attention; 256 experts, 8 routed + 1 shared active

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemini 4 Argon ↗Qwen3.6-35B-A3B ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemini 4 Argon 48.6/100Rank 19/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 36 ptsTurn 7 / 20

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 20.7/100Rank 40/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Level 1Second Thoughts
26 ptsSurvived
4 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
9 ptsOut of lives
3 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
6 ptsOut of lives
9 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemini 4 Argon 82.6/100Rank 6/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 3.6/100Rank 44/48

Cleared 1 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 57.8 ptsTurn 36 / 40

Points per level

LevelGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
1 ptsOut of turns
Level 3Relay vault
19.2 ptsCleared
0.2 ptsFinished early
Level 4Passing bay
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
3 ptsOut of turns
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
7.8 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

The central sphere, separate airborne black blob, flattened cyan contact and displaced crimson aftermath support the principal camera and physical-state requirements. Open lateral lanes and initial reflection placements provide partial optical structure, but missing outer chains, sparse nested imagery and incomplete emitter mappings remain substantial limitations. The raised crimson mass also weakens paint-scale fidelity.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

The artwork demonstrates rounded volume, recognizable paint colors and a compact black feature at an appropriate screen height. The enlarged main-sphere framing, unsupported crimson and cyan interaction histories, oversized compact paint balls and largely missing mirror structure remain substantial weaknesses. The core assessment is 20/170; with no demonstrated floor damage, the combined assessment remains 20/180.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6-35B-A3B
State at 600 ms24.5/252.5/25
Camera and placement14.5/154.0/15
Reflections50.5/1203.5/120
Materials and scale8.5/102.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An appealing, controlled illustration with a distinctive buoyant silhouette, expressive comic face and rich luminous colour. The full composition and grounded slipper read clearly. The principal limitation is the crowded raised-foot interaction: paws, toes and lining overlap without making the bent leg or tight fit unmistakable.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

An appealing fantasy illustration with coordinated ornament, readable suspension and luminous turquoise accents. Plausible limb attachments and soft shading support competent execution. Bear-like proportions, unclear paw gestures, insufficient white robe fabric, crowded chest details and shallow material modeling limit its finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness7.0/106.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/106.0/10
Space & placement7.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections7.5/107.0/10
Purposeful detail8.0/106.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects7.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity7.5/107.5/10

Benchmark task

Gemini 4 Argon

A luminous little dragon struggles with its bedtime slippers while a buoyant tail pulls it upward. The scene tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and the contrast between translucent forms and heavy objects.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

A coherent, moderately complex Mona Lisa reconstruction with substantial portrait volume, articulated clothing and landscape recession. Specific source features support replication beyond recognition alone. Altered facial likeness, uncertain crossed-hand anatomy and pervasive colored crackle keep the result uneven despite its developed shading and detail.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A recognizable but basic geometric interpretation. Muted colors and soft shading provide cohesion, while weak likeness, unresolved hands, rigid anatomy and shallow landscape construction substantially limit the replication.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness6.5/102.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/101.0/10
Space & placement6.5/102.0/10
Light & reflections7.0/100.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/101.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/101.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/101.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/102.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

A strong decorative beach illustration with controlled color, intricate silhouettes and abundant playful detail. Connected dolphin forms and recognizable equipment support its construction, while the aligned sunset reflection anchors the scene. Compressed wave depth, ambiguous foreground support and uneven reflection specificity limit physical coherence. The saved comparisons support retaining the category assessments.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A recognizable beach sunset with balanced framing and appealing color transitions. Birds, boats and small animals fulfill the main scene requirements. Elementary anatomy, faint details, weak grounding and rigid reflection columns limit depth and finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness9.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/104.5/10
Space & placement8.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections8.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail9.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character8.0/104.5/10
Materials & effects8.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/105.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An accomplished illustration with expressive characters, intricate spray and strong depth. Direct back seating, steering connections and hull-water contact are only partly demonstrated. Clean graphic execution and purposeful detail remain strengths, while shadows and reflections provide limited physical grounding.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Clean shapes, cheerful faces and bright colors make the riding arrangement readable. The dog does not visibly operate the control, while awkward limbs, shallow hull placement and stiff poses limit credibility. Gradients and layered foam add modest volume and motion. The obscured tail attachment does not establish detachment.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness8.5/104.5/10
Anatomy & construction8.0/103.5/10
Space & placement7.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections7.5/103.5/10
Purposeful detail8.5/104.5/10
Artistry & character8.5/104.0/10
Materials & effects8.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/103.5/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An expressive, detailed illustration with controlled gradients and coherent environmental depth. Continuous body contours and connected bicycle components establish competent construction. Steering grip and pedal engagement remain less explicit than the decorative details and wheel placement. These contact uncertainties limit action and placement credit without establishing broken anatomy.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A cheerful, readable illustration with a distinctive pelican silhouette, clean contours and an orderly landscape. Soft glow and restrained shading provide modest atmosphere. Construction is weaker: the handlebar is disconnected, wings do not reach the controls, and overlapping legs leave pedaling ambiguous. Simple forms and mostly flat materials limit depth and drawing sophistication.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness9.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction8.5/103.5/10
Space & placement8.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections8.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail8.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character8.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects8.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity8.5/104.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.