STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Gemini 4 Argon vs MISSINGNO.

Gemini 4 Argon leads MISSINGNO. by 28.7 points on StealthMark, 67.4 to 38.7. It leads on all 7 benchmarks with results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
Model guide ↗

Overall StealthMark

67.4/100Overall rank 5/53
38.7/100Overall rank 36/53

General Intelligence

63.6/100
35.3/100

Visual Intelligence

74.4/100
42.4/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • MISSINGNO.Multi-step reasoning not measured

Open or local

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • MISSINGNO.
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on StealthMark. MISSINGNO. runs 5.9× faster in our speed test.

  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • MISSINGNO.
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Gemini 4 Argon: $10$2 inputMISSINGNO.: No list price
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Gemini 4 Argon: 1M1M max outputMISSINGNO.: Not published
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Gemini 4 Argon: 144tokens/sMISSINGNO.: 8465.9× fastertokens/s
Developer
GoogleNot published
Released
13 Oct 2026Not published
Origin
United StatesNot published
Input → output
Text, image, audio, video, PDF → textNot published
Architecture
Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) transformer with native multimodal inputsNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemini 4 Argon ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemini 4 Argon 48.6/100Rank 19/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 36 ptsTurn 7 / 20

Points per level

LevelGemini 4 ArgonMISSINGNO.
Level 1Second Thoughts
26 ptsSurvived
No run
Level 2Pressure Pot
9 ptsOut of lives
No run
Level 3Hide or Flight
6 ptsOut of lives
No run

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemini 4 Argon 82.6/100Rank 6/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelGemini 4 ArgonMISSINGNO.
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
No run
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
No run
Level 3Relay vault
19.2 ptsCleared
No run
Level 4Passing bay
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
No run
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
No run

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

The central sphere, separate airborne black blob, flattened cyan contact and displaced crimson aftermath support the principal camera and physical-state requirements. Open lateral lanes and initial reflection placements provide partial optical structure, but missing outer chains, sparse nested imagery and incomplete emitter mappings remain substantial limitations. The raised crimson mass also weakens paint-scale fidelity.

MISSINGNO.

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMISSINGNO.
State at 600 ms24.5/2519.0/25
Camera and placement14.5/157.0/15
Reflections50.5/12012.0/120
Materials and scale8.5/105.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An appealing, controlled illustration with a distinctive buoyant silhouette, expressive comic face and rich luminous colour. The full composition and grounded slipper read clearly. The principal limitation is the crowded raised-foot interaction: paws, toes and lining overlap without making the bent leg or tight fit unmistakable.

MISSINGNO.

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness7.0/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/104.5/10
Space & placement7.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections7.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail8.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/104.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/106.0/10

Benchmark task

Gemini 4 Argon

A luminous little dragon struggles with its bedtime slippers while a buoyant tail pulls it upward. The scene tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and the contrast between translucent forms and heavy objects.

MISSINGNO.

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

A coherent, moderately complex Mona Lisa reconstruction with substantial portrait volume, articulated clothing and landscape recession. Specific source features support replication beyond recognition alone. Altered facial likeness, uncertain crossed-hand anatomy and pervasive colored crackle keep the result uneven despite its developed shading and detail.

MISSINGNO.

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness6.5/101.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/102.5/10
Space & placement6.5/102.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/103.0/10
Purposeful detail6.0/102.0/10
Artistry & character6.5/103.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/102.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/106.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

A strong decorative beach illustration with controlled color, intricate silhouettes and abundant playful detail. Connected dolphin forms and recognizable equipment support its construction, while the aligned sunset reflection anchors the scene. Compressed wave depth, ambiguous foreground support and uneven reflection specificity limit physical coherence. The saved comparisons support retaining the category assessments.

MISSINGNO.

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness9.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/104.0/10
Space & placement8.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections8.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail9.0/103.0/10
Artistry & character8.0/103.0/10
Materials & effects8.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/103.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MISSINGNO.

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An accomplished illustration with expressive characters, intricate spray and strong depth. Direct back seating, steering connections and hull-water contact are only partly demonstrated. Clean graphic execution and purposeful detail remain strengths, while shadows and reflections provide limited physical grounding.

MISSINGNO.

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness8.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction8.0/104.5/10
Space & placement7.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections7.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail8.5/106.0/10
Artistry & character8.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects8.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An expressive, detailed illustration with controlled gradients and coherent environmental depth. Continuous body contours and connected bicycle components establish competent construction. Steering grip and pedal engagement remain less explicit than the decorative details and wheel placement. These contact uncertainties limit action and placement credit without establishing broken anatomy.

MISSINGNO.

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness9.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction8.5/105.5/10
Space & placement8.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections8.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail8.5/105.5/10
Artistry & character8.5/106.0/10
Materials & effects8.5/104.5/10
Visual integrity8.5/106.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.