STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Gemini 4 Argon leads MiniMax M3.1 Flash by 21.5 points on StealthMark, 67.4 to 45.9. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

67.4/100Overall rank 5/53
45.9/100Overall rank 24/53

General Intelligence

63.6/100
35.8/100

Visual Intelligence

74.4/100
62.6/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Gemini 4 Argon: $10$2 inputMiniMax M3.1 Flash: No list price
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Gemini 4 Argon: 1MTied1M max outputMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1MTied
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Gemini 4 Argon: 144tokens/sMiniMax M3.1 Flash: Not measured
SizeTotal and active parameters
Gemini 4 Argon: Not disclosedMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 428B23B active
Developer
GoogleMiniMax
Released
13 Oct 2026Not published
Origin
United StatesNot published
Input → output
Text, image, audio, video, PDF → textText, image, video → text
Architecture
Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) transformer with native multimodal inputsMixture-of-Experts with MiniMax Sparse Attention and native multimodal encoder

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemini 4 Argon ↗MiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemini 4 Argon 48.6/100Rank 19/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 36 ptsTurn 7 / 20

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 30.7/100Rank 28/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Level 1Second Thoughts
26 ptsSurvived
6 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
9 ptsOut of lives
5 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
6 ptsOut of lives
9 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemini 4 Argon 82.6/100Rank 6/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 21.9/100Rank 38/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 517.2 ptsTurn 24 / 40

Points per level

LevelGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
8.6 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 3Relay vault
19.2 ptsCleared
5 ptsOut of turns
Level 4Passing bay
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
4.4 ptsFinished early
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
17.2 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

The central sphere, separate airborne black blob, flattened cyan contact and displaced crimson aftermath support the principal camera and physical-state requirements. Open lateral lanes and initial reflection placements provide partial optical structure, but missing outer chains, sparse nested imagery and incomplete emitter mappings remain substantial limitations. The raised crimson mass also weakens paint-scale fidelity.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
State at 600 ms24.5/2520.0/25
Camera and placement14.5/1510.0/15
Reflections50.5/12024.0/120
Materials and scale8.5/108.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An appealing, controlled illustration with a distinctive buoyant silhouette, expressive comic face and rich luminous colour. The full composition and grounded slipper read clearly. The principal limitation is the crowded raised-foot interaction: paws, toes and lining overlap without making the bent leg or tight fit unmistakable.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness7.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/106.0/10
Space & placement7.5/107.0/10
Light & reflections7.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail8.0/105.0/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects7.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/106.0/10

Benchmark task

Gemini 4 Argon

A luminous little dragon struggles with its bedtime slippers while a buoyant tail pulls it upward. The scene tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and the contrast between translucent forms and heavy objects.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

A coherent, moderately complex Mona Lisa reconstruction with substantial portrait volume, articulated clothing and landscape recession. Specific source features support replication beyond recognition alone. Altered facial likeness, uncertain crossed-hand anatomy and pervasive colored crackle keep the result uneven despite its developed shading and detail.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness6.5/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/104.5/10
Space & placement6.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/106.0/10
Materials & effects7.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/105.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

A strong decorative beach illustration with controlled color, intricate silhouettes and abundant playful detail. Connected dolphin forms and recognizable equipment support its construction, while the aligned sunset reflection anchors the scene. Compressed wave depth, ambiguous foreground support and uneven reflection specificity limit physical coherence. The saved comparisons support retaining the category assessments.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness9.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/107.0/10
Space & placement8.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections8.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail9.0/108.0/10
Artistry & character8.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects8.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An accomplished illustration with expressive characters, intricate spray and strong depth. Direct back seating, steering connections and hull-water contact are only partly demonstrated. Clean graphic execution and purposeful detail remain strengths, while shadows and reflections provide limited physical grounding.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness8.5/109.0/10
Anatomy & construction8.0/108.0/10
Space & placement7.5/108.0/10
Light & reflections7.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail8.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character8.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects8.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An expressive, detailed illustration with controlled gradients and coherent environmental depth. Continuous body contours and connected bicycle components establish competent construction. Steering grip and pedal engagement remain less explicit than the decorative details and wheel placement. These contact uncertainties limit action and placement credit without establishing broken anatomy.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness9.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction8.5/106.5/10
Space & placement8.0/108.0/10
Light & reflections8.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail8.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character8.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects8.5/107.0/10
Visual integrity8.5/106.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.