Gemini 4 Argon 48.6/100Rank 19/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Gemini 4 Argon leads Iceman Contributor by 48.2 points on StealthMark, 67.4 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on StealthMark and runs 3.1× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemini 4 Argon ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Gemini 4 Argon
The central sphere, separate airborne black blob, flattened cyan contact and displaced crimson aftermath support the principal camera and physical-state requirements. Open lateral lanes and initial reflection placements provide partial optical structure, but missing outer chains, sparse nested imagery and incomplete emitter mappings remain substantial limitations. The raised crimson mass also weakens paint-scale fidelity.
Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Iceman Contributor |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 24.5/25 | 0.5/25 |
| Camera and placement | 14.5/15 | 2.5/15 |
| Reflections | 50.5/120 | 7.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 8.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Gemini 4 Argon
An appealing, controlled illustration with a distinctive buoyant silhouette, expressive comic face and rich luminous colour. The full composition and grounded slipper read clearly. The principal limitation is the crowded raised-foot interaction: paws, toes and lining overlap without making the bent leg or tight fit unmistakable.
Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Iceman Contributor |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
Gemini 4 Argon
A luminous little dragon struggles with its bedtime slippers while a buoyant tail pulls it upward. The scene tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and the contrast between translucent forms and heavy objects.
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Gemini 4 Argon
A coherent, moderately complex Mona Lisa reconstruction with substantial portrait volume, articulated clothing and landscape recession. Specific source features support replication beyond recognition alone. Altered facial likeness, uncertain crossed-hand anatomy and pervasive colored crackle keep the result uneven despite its developed shading and detail.
Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Iceman Contributor |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Gemini 4 Argon
A strong decorative beach illustration with controlled color, intricate silhouettes and abundant playful detail. Connected dolphin forms and recognizable equipment support its construction, while the aligned sunset reflection anchors the scene. Compressed wave depth, ambiguous foreground support and uneven reflection specificity limit physical coherence. The saved comparisons support retaining the category assessments.
Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Iceman Contributor |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 9.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 8.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 9.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Gemini 4 Argon
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Gemini 4 Argon
An accomplished illustration with expressive characters, intricate spray and strong depth. Direct back seating, steering connections and hull-water contact are only partly demonstrated. Clean graphic execution and purposeful detail remain strengths, while shadows and reflections provide limited physical grounding.
Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Iceman Contributor |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 8.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Gemini 4 Argon
An expressive, detailed illustration with controlled gradients and coherent environmental depth. Continuous body contours and connected bicycle components establish competent construction. Steering grip and pedal engagement remain less explicit than the decorative details and wheel placement. These contact uncertainties limit action and placement credit without establishing broken anatomy.
Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Iceman Contributor |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 9.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 8.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 8.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.