STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Fledge Alpha vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads Fledge Alpha by 10.1 points on StealthMark, 45.9 to 35.8. It leads on all 7 benchmarks with results for both. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

35.8/100Overall rank 38/53
45.9/100Overall rank 24/53

General Intelligence

27.1/100
35.8/100

Visual Intelligence

45.2/100
62.6/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • Fledge AlphaMulti-step reasoning not measured

Open or local

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Fledge Alpha
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

  • Fledge Alpha
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Other models
  • Median
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Fledge Alpha: Not publishedMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1M
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Fledge Alpha: 63tokens/sMiniMax M3.1 Flash: Not measured
SizeTotal and active parameters
Fledge Alpha: Not disclosedMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 428B23B active
Developer
Not publishedMiniMax
Input → output
Not publishedText, image, video → text
Architecture
Not publishedMixture-of-Experts with MiniMax Sparse Attention and native multimodal encoder

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 30.7/100Rank 28/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelFledge AlphaMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Level 1Second Thoughts
No run
6 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
No run
5 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
No run
9 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 21.9/100Rank 38/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 517.2 ptsTurn 24 / 40

Points per level

LevelFledge AlphaMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Level 1Hold the door
No run
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
No run
8.6 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 3Relay vault
No run
5 ptsOut of turns
Level 4Passing bay
No run
4.4 ptsFinished early
Level 5Second thoughts
No run
17.2 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Fledge Alpha

The candidate communicates a round metallic sphere, three paint colors and a separate airborne black blob. Its hovering support relationship, displaced framing and unresolved paint interaction limit physical credit. Sparse planar light ghosts and a soft sphere highlight provide little evidence for the required wall/floor repetitions and curved nested mirror imagery.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.

Score breakdown

CategoryFledge AlphaMiniMax M3.1 Flash
State at 600 ms9.0/2520.0/25
Camera and placement5.0/1510.0/15
Reflections7.5/12024.0/120
Materials and scale3.5/108.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Fledge Alpha

A coherent, appealing mascot with expressive eyes, a cheerful beak and a readable swept-back silhouette. Its larger forward foot and trailing feathers suggest a running stride, but the upright body, stiff legs and minimally articulated feet limit convincing motion. Clean flat shapes suit the brief, while uneven feather junctions and incomplete cream accents reduce polish.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryFledge AlphaMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness7.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/106.0/10
Space & placement7.0/107.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail6.5/105.0/10
Artistry & character4.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/106.0/10

Benchmark task

Fledge Alpha

An eager young seabird running toward the viewer tests expressive anatomy, balance and a convincing forward-moving pose.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Fledge Alpha

A recognizable but basic Mona Lisa reinterpretation with a coherent silhouette and subdued palette. Curtain-like hair obscures much of the face, while elongated facial construction and oversized, minimally articulated hands substantially weaken replication. Soft shading supplies modest volume, but anatomy, landscape depth and purposeful detail remain underdeveloped.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.

Score breakdown

CategoryFledge AlphaMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness3.0/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction3.0/104.5/10
Space & placement2.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections2.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects2.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity2.5/105.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Fledge Alpha

A cheerful, recognizable sunset beach with a cohesive warm palette and clear accessories. Simple construction, uncertain palm support, an ambiguous upper boundary and schematic reflections limit depth and finish. The scene communicates its subject successfully but lacks the developed forms, lighting and detail of exceptional illustration.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.

Score breakdown

CategoryFledge AlphaMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness7.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/107.0/10
Space & placement5.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/106.0/10
Purposeful detail3.0/108.0/10
Artistry & character3.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects2.5/106.5/10
Visual integrity4.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Fledge Alpha

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Fledge Alpha

An appealing sunset illustration with recognizable characters and a clear riding action. Color, expression and silhouette are stronger than anatomical construction: overlapping paws obscure support, the dog's steering limb is simplified, and the vehicle controls lack definition. The wake conveys movement, while lighting and water reflections remain decorative.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.

Score breakdown

CategoryFledge AlphaMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness8.5/109.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/108.0/10
Space & placement7.5/108.0/10
Light & reflections6.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity4.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Fledge Alpha

A clear, cheerful illustration with a recognizable pelican, coherent bicycle silhouette and tidy composition. Simplified leg articulation, steering contact, mechanical detail and lighting keep it at a competent illustrative level.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryFledge AlphaMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness8.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/106.5/10
Space & placement6.5/108.0/10
Light & reflections4.5/107.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects5.5/107.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/106.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.