STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Cat Jam Free vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Cat Jam Free leads Qwen3.6-35B-A3B by 12.7 points on StealthMark, 33.5 to 20.8. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on 2. Cat Jam Free scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

33.5/100Overall rank 40/53
20.8/100Overall rank 46/53

General Intelligence

27.7/100
12.7/100

Visual Intelligence

43.0/100
34.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

NeitherApache-2.0
Local modelOpen model · Apache-2.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Cat Jam Free
  • Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

  • Cat Jam Free
  • Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Cat Jam Free: No list priceQwen3.6-35B-A3B: $1.49$0.25 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Cat Jam Free: Not publishedQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 1.01M64K max output
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Cat Jam Free: Not measuredQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 577tokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Cat Jam Free: Not disclosedQwen3.6-35B-A3B: 35B3B active
Developer
Not publishedQwen
Released
Not published16 Apr 2026
Origin
Not publishedChina
Input → output
Not publishedText, image, video → text
Architecture
Not publishedMoE causal language model with vision encoder; Gated DeltaNet + gated attention; 256 experts, 8 routed + 1 shared active

Full datasheets, every price and sourceQwen3.6-35B-A3B ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Cat Jam Free 33.8/100Rank 26/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 20.7/100Rank 40/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelCat Jam FreeQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Level 1Second Thoughts
5 ptsOut of lives
4 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
6 ptsOut of lives
3 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
9 ptsSurvived
9 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Cat Jam Free 33.9/100Rank 33/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 56 ptsTurn 25 / 40

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 3.6/100Rank 44/48

Cleared 1 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 57.8 ptsTurn 36 / 40

Points per level

LevelCat Jam FreeQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
1 ptsOut of turns
Level 3Relay vault
10 ptsFinished early
0.2 ptsFinished early
Level 4Passing bay
10.8 ptsFinished early
3 ptsOut of turns
Level 5Second thoughts
6 ptsFinished early
7.8 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The image conveys a supported central sphere, separate black paint and crimson below cyan. Its contact and transport story is partially resolved. The exterior cutaway camera and largely missing mirror system dominate the limitations; isolated discs and smooth highlights provide little coherent optical structure.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

The artwork demonstrates rounded volume, recognizable paint colors and a compact black feature at an appropriate screen height. The enlarged main-sphere framing, unsupported crimson and cyan interaction histories, oversized compact paint balls and largely missing mirror structure remain substantial weaknesses. The core assessment is 20/170; with no demonstrated floor damage, the combined assessment remains 20/180.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeQwen3.6-35B-A3B
State at 600 ms14.0/252.5/25
Camera and placement4.0/154.0/15
Reflections3.5/1203.5/120
Materials and scale4.0/102.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

A coherent, restrained cat illustration captures the pale palette and intent eyes. Its central expressive requirement—the committed forward-and-down neck bob—is insufficiently articulated. Simple geometry, faint paw construction and minimal surface detail limit the physical presence and finish.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

An appealing fantasy illustration with coordinated ornament, readable suspension and luminous turquoise accents. Plausible limb attachments and soft shading support competent execution. Bear-like proportions, unclear paw gestures, insufficient white robe fabric, crowded chest details and shallow material modeling limit its finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness5.5/106.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/106.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/106.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/107.5/10

Benchmark task

Cat Jam Free

An ivory cat nods intently to music beside a tiny speaker. The scene tests feline anatomy, movement conveyed through a still pose and the contrast between pale fur and woven fabric.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The portrait is recognizable and cleanly assembled, but replication remains basic. Its frontal symmetry, elongated silhouette, simplified facial likeness and unresolved hands differ markedly from the original. Modest skin gradients provide volume, while clothing and landscape rely on broad, flat shapes.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A recognizable but basic geometric interpretation. Muted colors and soft shading provide cohesion, while weak likeness, unresolved hands, rigid anatomy and shallow landscape construction substantially limit the replication.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness2.5/102.0/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/101.0/10
Space & placement4.0/102.0/10
Light & reflections3.5/100.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/101.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/101.5/10
Materials & effects2.5/101.5/10
Visual integrity5.5/102.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The scene clearly supplies the requested beach subjects and playful activity. Clean silhouettes and warm gradients support readability, but elementary drawing, ambiguous parasol construction, weak grounding and a rigid sun reflection limit its depth and finish.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A recognizable beach sunset with balanced framing and appealing color transitions. Birds, boats and small animals fulfill the main scene requirements. Elementary anatomy, faint details, weak grounding and rigid reflection columns limit depth and finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness7.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/104.5/10
Space & placement4.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail4.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character4.5/104.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity5.5/105.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

An appealing cartoon demonstrates the back-riding arrangement through expressive faces and clean shapes. Uncertain steering contact, indistinct deck support and weak hull-water interaction limit physical coherence. Smooth gradients add volume, but simple rounded construction and sparse material detail constrain complexity and finish.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Clean shapes, cheerful faces and bright colors make the riding arrangement readable. The dog does not visibly operate the control, while awkward limbs, shallow hull placement and stiff poses limit credibility. Gradients and layered foam add modest volume and motion. The obscured tail attachment does not establish detachment.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness6.0/104.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/103.5/10
Space & placement5.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/103.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/104.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity4.5/103.5/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

A coherent cartoon with readable bicycle placement, controlled outlines and modest surface shading. The separated-looking upper bill weakens pelican likeness; schematic limbs, uncertain gripping contact and simplified mechanics constrain construction. Opaque wheel interiors flatten spatial relationships. Limited feather complexity and directional lighting keep the finish modest.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

A cheerful, readable illustration with a distinctive pelican silhouette, clean contours and an orderly landscape. Soft glow and restrained shading provide modest atmosphere. Construction is weaker: the handlebar is disconnected, wings do not reach the controls, and overlapping legs leave pedaling ambiguous. Simple forms and mostly flat materials limit depth and drawing sophistication.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeQwen3.6-35B-A3B
Task & likeness7.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/103.5/10
Space & placement6.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/105.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/104.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.