STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Muse Wonder vs Qwen4-Max-Preview

Qwen4-Max-Preview leads Muse Wonder by 1.8 points on StealthMark, 58.8 to 57.0. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Muse Wonder on 2. Qwen4-Max-Preview scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

57.0/100Overall rank 13/58
58.8/100Overall rank 12/58

General Intelligence

53.1/100
54.6/100

Visual Intelligence

64.0/100
66.3/100

Reasoning efficiency

How many reasoning tokens a model needs for the quality it delivers.

Single-step reasoning How much it reasons to understand a task

Multi-step reasoning How much it keeps reasoning as a task goes on

Cost efficiency

How much Performance you get for your money.

  • Qwen4-Max-PreviewNot measured

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Muse Wonder
  • Qwen4-Max-Preview
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Muse Wonder runs 8.6× faster in our speed test. Qwen4-Max-Preview scores higher on StealthMark.

  • Muse Wonder
  • Qwen4-Max-Preview
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Muse Wonder: $20$4 inputQwen4-Max-Preview: No list price
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Muse Wonder: 1MQwen4-Max-Preview: Not published
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Muse Wonder: 5708.6× fastertokens/sQwen4-Max-Preview: 66tokens/s
Developer
MetaNot published
Released
12 Oct 2026Not published
Origin
United StatesNot published
Input → output
Text, image, video, audio, PDF → textNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 20/54

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Qwen4-Max-Preview 57.5/100Rank 14/54

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 310 ptsTurn 15 / 20

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderQwen4-Max-Preview
Level 1Second Thoughts
16 ptsOut of lives
20 ptsSurvived
Level 2Pressure Pot
10 ptsOut of lives
12 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
11 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 22/55

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Qwen4-Max-Preview 67.3/100Rank 21/55

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderQwen4-Max-Preview
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9 ptsCleared
8.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 3Relay vault
18.8 ptsCleared
19.2 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
17.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Qwen4-Max-Preview

The main placement, compact airborne black and contrasting cyan/crimson interaction states are largely supported. Recognizable first mirror images earn substantial local credit despite modest silhouette and overlap errors. Most of the defining mirror system remains missing, especially nested spherical imagery, outer chains and repeated emitter mapping. Crimson also extends slightly too far down the facing surface.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen4-Max-Preview
State at 600 ms22.0/2524.5/25
Camera and placement12.0/1514.0/15
Reflections21.5/12039.0/120
Materials and scale7.5/106.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Qwen4-Max-Preview

A coherent celestial character with readable costume layers, controlled ornament and coordinated luminous accents. Simplified joints, shallow frontal space and limited material modeling constrain construction and drawing complexity. The raised palm's orientation remains only partially demonstrated.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen4-Max-Preview
Task & likeness7.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/107.5/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail7.5/108.0/10
Artistry & character6.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/106.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Qwen4-Max-Preview

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Qwen4-Max-Preview

A coherent, recognizable interpretation with developed facial shading and purposeful portrait details. The frontal, nearly symmetric body, inflated sleeves and unresolved hand articulation substantially limit replication and construction. Layered scenery supplies basic depth, while uniformly smooth surfaces and schematic folds constrain material character and drawing complexity.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen4-Max-Preview
Task & likeness5.5/104.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/105.5/10
Space & placement5.5/105.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/106.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/105.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Qwen4-Max-Preview

A coherent sunset illustration with sweeping palms, recognizable wildlife and varied, readable beach details. Atmospheric layering and controlled contours strengthen its character. Basic animal anatomy, overhead-looking foreground creatures and schematic cast shadows limit construction and physical depth.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen4-Max-Preview
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/108.0/10
Space & placement6.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.5/107.5/10
Purposeful detail9.0/108.0/10
Artistry & character7.0/108.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Qwen4-Max-Preview

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Qwen4-Max-Preview

An expressive cartoon with purposeful accessory detail, readable steering and directional spray. The aligned sunset reflection adds physical coherence. Simplified joints and the frontal raccoon's uncertain seated support continue to limit anatomy, perspective and integrity.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen4-Max-Preview
Task & likeness7.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/107.5/10
Space & placement6.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections4.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/108.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/106.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Qwen4-Max-Preview

A detailed coastal illustration with readable seated support, steering and pedal contacts. Continuous anatomy, coherent bicycle construction and purposeful small features support its expressive composition. Simplified limb articulation, modest perspective depth and weakly directional ground shadows limit physical conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen4-Max-Preview
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/108.0/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail8.5/108.0/10
Artistry & character7.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.