STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Mistral Large 4 by 13.7 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 43.3. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Mistral Large 4 on 2. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

43.3/100Overall rank 31/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

34.4/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

58.0/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Mistral Large 4
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Mistral Large 4 is 4.8× cheaper per output token. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 3.8× faster in our speed test. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Mistral Large 4
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Mistral Large 4: $4.184.8× cheaper$1.36 inputMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Mistral Large 4: 1MTied256K max outputMuse Wonder: 1MTied
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Mistral Large 4: 151tokens/sMuse Wonder: 5703.8× fastertokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Mistral Large 4: 1.05T49B activeMuse Wonder: Not disclosed
Developer
Mistral AIMeta
Released
6 Oct 202612 Oct 2026
Origin
FranceUnited States
Input → output
Text, image → textText, image, video, audio, PDF → text
Architecture
Granular mixture of experts (MoE); multimodal text and image input, text output.Not published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMistral Large 4 ↗Muse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Mistral Large 4 22.0/100Rank 39/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 34 ptsTurn 8 / 20

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelMistral Large 4Muse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
1 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
9 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
4 ptsOut of lives
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Mistral Large 4 49.4/100Rank 23/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 519.8 ptsTurn 31 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelMistral Large 4Muse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.6 ptsCleared
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
15.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
16.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
19.8 ptsCleared
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Mistral Large 4

The central sphere, airborne black and deformed crimson support substantial state and placement credit. Recent cyan contact and crimson transport remain uncertain. Sparse wall patches and glossy gradients provide little evidence of the required extensive mirror system, while the missing centerline lamp and bulky crimson remain visible weaknesses.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryMistral Large 4Muse Wonder
State at 600 ms17.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement11.0/1512.0/15
Reflections12.0/12021.5/120
Materials and scale5.5/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Mistral Large 4

An appealing, coherent illustration whose enormous rounded cat anchors the windblown composition. Warm shading and floating sketches communicate the brief well. Simplified paws, faint ear construction, inconsistent wind cues and limited material texture keep the execution below exceptional.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryMistral Large 4Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/107.0/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Mistral Large 4

A heavy ginger cat stays planted on a terrace as wind carries papers around it. The scene tests weight, expression and the contrast between stable and moving forms.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Mistral Large 4

A recognizable, cleanly rendered interpretation with a restrained palette and some facial modeling. Its enlarged frontal head, simplified expression, compressed low hands and schematic landscape substantially limit likeness and construction. The smooth rendering does not reproduce the painting's nuanced anatomy, clothing or atmospheric depth.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryMistral Large 4Muse Wonder
Task & likeness4.0/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.5/105.5/10
Space & placement5.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections4.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail4.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character4.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Mistral Large 4

A clean, appealing beach illustration with clear subject coverage, a cohesive sunset palette and expressive animal details. Bodies and accessories resolve basic construction coherently, although joints remain schematic. Layered shapes establish modest depth; generic oval shadows and flat surfaces limit physical richness. Repeated forms and sparse articulation leave room for more accomplished drawing.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryMistral Large 4Muse Wonder
Task & likeness7.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/106.0/10
Space & placement7.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character6.0/107.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Mistral Large 4

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Mistral Large 4

The central interaction is clear, with recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent sunset composition. Clean contours and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Simplified joints, uncertain steering attachment, shallow hull volume and limited directional lighting constrain its physical resolution.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryMistral Large 4Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/105.5/10
Space & placement7.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/107.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Mistral Large 4

A coherent, appealing pelican illustration with a continuous body silhouette, readable bicycle and grounded wheels. Simplified legs and ambiguous steering and pedal connections limit construction. Clean shapes and expressive accessories succeed, while shallow depth, modest lighting and sparse material differentiation leave substantial room for refinement.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryMistral Large 4Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/106.0/10
Space & placement7.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail7.0/108.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.