STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

MISSINGNO. vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads MISSINGNO. by 18.3 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 38.7. It leads on all 7 benchmarks with results for both. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

38.7/100Overall rank 36/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

35.3/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

42.4/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • MISSINGNO.Multi-step reasoning not measured

Open or local

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • MISSINGNO.
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

MISSINGNO. runs 48% faster in our speed test. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark.

  • MISSINGNO.
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
MISSINGNO.: No list priceMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
MISSINGNO.: Not publishedMuse Wonder: 1M
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
MISSINGNO.: 84648% fastertokens/sMuse Wonder: 570tokens/s
Developer
Not publishedMeta
Released
Not published12 Oct 2026
Origin
Not publishedUnited States
Input → output
Not publishedText, image, video, audio, PDF → text

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelMISSINGNO.Muse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
No run
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
No run
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
No run
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelMISSINGNO.Muse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
No run
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
No run
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
No run
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
No run
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
No run
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

MISSINGNO.

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryMISSINGNO.Muse Wonder
State at 600 ms19.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement7.0/1512.0/15
Reflections12.0/12021.5/120
Materials and scale5.5/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

MISSINGNO.

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryMISSINGNO.Muse Wonder
Task & likeness5.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/107.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/107.0/10
Purposeful detail4.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character4.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects4.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity6.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

MISSINGNO.

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

MISSINGNO.

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryMISSINGNO.Muse Wonder
Task & likeness1.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/105.5/10
Space & placement2.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections3.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail2.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character3.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity6.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

MISSINGNO.

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryMISSINGNO.Muse Wonder
Task & likeness7.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/106.0/10
Space & placement6.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character3.0/107.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity3.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

MISSINGNO.

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

MISSINGNO.

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryMISSINGNO.Muse Wonder
Task & likeness8.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/105.5/10
Space & placement5.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

MISSINGNO.

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryMISSINGNO.Muse Wonder
Task & likeness7.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/108.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/107.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.