STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MISSINGNO. vs Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads MISSINGNO. by 18.3 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 38.7. It leads on all 7 benchmarks with results for both. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘Overall StealthMark
General Intelligence
Visual Intelligence
Reasoning efficiency
On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem
Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows
- MISSINGNO.Multi-step reasoning not measured
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
Where each model leads
- MISSINGNO.
- Muse Wonder
- Other models
- Median
Games
SVG
DATASHEET
Specs and pricing
MISSINGNO. runs 48% faster in our speed test. Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark.
- MISSINGNO.
- Muse Wonder
- Other models
- Median
- Developer
- Not publishedMeta
- Released
- Not published12 Oct 2026
- Origin
- Not publishedUnited States
- Input → output
- Not publishedText, image, video, audio, PDF → text
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗
Foresight
Play Foresight yourselfAnticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.
Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Points per level
Latch
Play Latch yourselfCooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.
MISSINGNO.No run
Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Points per level
Newton's Mirror
Same task instructionsPhysics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗
MISSINGNO. 27.8/100 Rank 28/53

Muse Wonder 39.7/100 Rank 17/53

The judgment
MISSINGNO.
The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.
Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
Score breakdown
| Category | MISSINGNO. | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 19.0/25 | 22.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 7.0/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 12.0/120 | 21.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 5.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
Benchmark task
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Selfie
Different task instructionsVisual construction and creative interpretation.
MISSINGNO. 49.7/100 Rank 41/53

Muse Wonder 71.5/100 Rank 17/53

The judgment
MISSINGNO.
An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.
Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
Score breakdown
| Category | MISSINGNO. | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Benchmark task
MISSINGNO.
A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Mona Lisa
Same task instructionsPrecise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.
MISSINGNO. 28.1/100 Rank 36/53

Muse Wonder 55.7/100 Rank 8/53

The judgment
MISSINGNO.
Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.
Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
Score breakdown
| Category | MISSINGNO. | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
Benchmark task
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Beach
Same task instructionsCreativity, perspective and visual beauty.
MISSINGNO. 43.9/100 Rank 46/53

Muse Wonder 71.0/100 Rank 15/53

The judgment
MISSINGNO.
A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.
Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
Score breakdown
| Category | MISSINGNO. | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
Benchmark task
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Ground Truth
Same task instructionsPhysical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.
MISSINGNO. 42.8/100 Rank 21/53

Muse Wonder 59.9/100 Rank 11/53

The judgment
MISSINGNO.
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Benchmark task
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Raccoon
Same task instructionsScene composition and interacting subjects.
MISSINGNO. 56.3/100 Rank 29/53

Muse Wonder 61.8/100 Rank 24/53

The judgment
MISSINGNO.
The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.
Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
Score breakdown
| Category | MISSINGNO. | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
Benchmark task
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Pelican
Same task instructionsSubject construction and spatial relationships.
MISSINGNO. 58.8/100 Rank 39/53

Muse Wonder 72.3/100 Rank 16/53

The judgment
MISSINGNO.
A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.
Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
Score breakdown
| Category | MISSINGNO. | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
Benchmark task
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.