STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads MiniMax M3.1 Flash by 11.1 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 45.9. It leads on 6 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash on 3. Muse Wonder scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

45.9/100Overall rank 24/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

35.8/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

62.6/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: No list priceMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1MTiedMuse Wonder: 1MTied
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: Not measuredMuse Wonder: 570tokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 428B23B activeMuse Wonder: Not disclosed
Developer
MiniMaxMeta
Released
Not published12 Oct 2026
Origin
Not publishedUnited States
Input → output
Text, image, video → textText, image, video, audio, PDF → text
Architecture
Mixture-of-Experts with MiniMax Sparse Attention and native multimodal encoderNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗Muse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 30.7/100Rank 28/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelMiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
6 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
5 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
9 ptsSurvived
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 21.9/100Rank 38/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 517.2 ptsTurn 24 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelMiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
8.6 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
5 ptsOut of turns
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
4.4 ptsFinished early
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
17.2 ptsFinished early
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder
State at 600 ms20.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement10.0/1512.0/15
Reflections24.0/12021.5/120
Materials and scale8.0/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder
Task & likeness7.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/107.0/10
Space & placement7.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail5.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity6.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder
Task & likeness4.0/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/105.5/10
Space & placement5.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections4.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/105.5/10
Artistry & character6.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects5.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/106.0/10
Space & placement7.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail8.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character6.5/107.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity7.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder
Task & likeness9.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction8.0/105.5/10
Space & placement8.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character7.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashMuse Wonder
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/106.0/10
Space & placement8.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/108.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.