MiMo-V2.6-Pro 54.6/100Rank 13/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads Qwen3.6-35B-A3B by 27.1 points on StealthMark, 47.9 to 20.8. It leads on 8 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on 1. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on StealthMark and is 1.7× cheaper per output token. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B runs 5× faster in our speed test. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiMo-V2.6-Pro ↗Qwen3.6-35B-A3B ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
The artwork demonstrates rounded volume, recognizable paint colors and a compact black feature at an appropriate screen height. The enlarged main-sphere framing, unsupported crimson and cyan interaction histories, oversized compact paint balls and largely missing mirror structure remain substantial weaknesses. The core assessment is 20/170; with no demonstrated floor damage, the combined assessment remains 20/180.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 23.0/25 | 2.5/25 |
| Camera and placement | 12.0/15 | 4.0/15 |
| Reflections | 19.0/120 | 3.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
An appealing fantasy illustration with coordinated ornament, readable suspension and luminous turquoise accents. Plausible limb attachments and soft shading support competent execution. Bear-like proportions, unclear paw gestures, insufficient white robe fabric, crowded chest details and shallow material modeling limit its finish.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A recognizable but basic geometric interpretation. Muted colors and soft shading provide cohesion, while weak likeness, unresolved hands, rigid anatomy and shallow landscape construction substantially limit the replication.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A recognizable beach sunset with balanced framing and appealing color transitions. Birds, boats and small animals fulfill the main scene requirements. Elementary anatomy, faint details, weak grounding and rigid reflection columns limit depth and finish.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Clean shapes, cheerful faces and bright colors make the riding arrangement readable. The dog does not visibly operate the control, while awkward limbs, shallow hull placement and stiff poses limit credibility. Gradients and layered foam add modest volume and motion. The obscured tail attachment does not establish detachment.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A cheerful, readable illustration with a distinctive pelican silhouette, clean contours and an orderly landscape. Soft glow and restrained shading provide modest atmosphere. Construction is weaker: the handlebar is disconnected, wings do not reach the controls, and overlapping legs leave pedaling ambiguous. Simple forms and mostly flat materials limit depth and drawing sophistication.
| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.