STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads Kolibri-1 by 32.3 points on StealthMark, 45.9 to 13.6. It leads on all 7 benchmarks with results for both. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘Overall StealthMark
General Intelligence
Visual Intelligence
Reasoning efficiency
On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem
Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows
- Kolibri-1Multi-step reasoning not measured
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
Where each model leads
- Kolibri-1
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Other models
- Median
Games
SVG
DATASHEET
Specs and pricing
Both take about 1M tokens of context.
- Kolibri-1
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Other models
- Median
- Developer
- Aleph AlphaMiniMax
- Released
- 3 Oct 2026Not published
- Origin
- GermanyNot published
- Input → output
- Text → textText, image, video → text
- Architecture
- Mixture-of-Experts with 4:1 sliding-window-attention to global-attention patternMixture-of-Experts with MiniMax Sparse Attention and native multimodal encoder
Full datasheets, every price and sourceKolibri-1 ↗MiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗
Foresight
Play Foresight yourselfAnticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 30.7/100Rank 28/47

Points per level
Latch
Play Latch yourselfCooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.
Kolibri-1No run
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 21.9/100Rank 38/48

Points per level
Newton's Mirror
Same task instructionsPhysics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗
Kolibri-1 10.4/100 Rank 47/53

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 39.8/100 Rank 16/53

The judgment
Kolibri-1
A segmented gray perimeter surrounds a black field containing one large, low-positioned gray sphere and two small colored circles. Rounded volume and restrained paint scale earn partial material credit. The image does not demonstrate the required optical structure, while paint history, airborne black and settled support remain largely unresolved.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.
Score breakdown
| Category | Kolibri-1 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 9.5/25 | 20.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 1.5/15 | 10.0/15 |
| Reflections | 0.0/120 | 24.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
Benchmark task
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Selfie
Different task instructionsVisual construction and creative interpretation.
Kolibri-1 22.9/100 Rank 53/53

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 61.7/100 Rank 27/53

The judgment
Kolibri-1
A restrained ivory, teal and green palette gives the image simple graphic coherence. Execution remains rudimentary: detached oval wings, ambiguous central anatomy and unclear feeding contact prevent a convincing hummingbird scene. The requested feather structure, botanical detail, lighting and enclosing arch are largely unresolved.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.
Score breakdown
| Category | Kolibri-1 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 1.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 1.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
Benchmark task
Kolibri-1
A jewel-coloured hummingbird hovering in flight tests avian anatomy, delicate structure and iridescent surface detail.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.
Mona Lisa
Different task instructionsPrecise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.
Kolibri-1 3.3/100 Rank 50/53

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 50.0/100 Rank 12/53

The judgment
Kolibri-1
The candidate offers a clean, highly simplified frontal portrait with warm skin and dark hair. Its oversized oval face, schematic features and unresolved body provide little Mona Lisa likeness. Missing crossed hands, clothing detail and landscape remove essential parts of the original composition; smooth gradients supply only limited volume.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.
Score breakdown
| Category | Kolibri-1 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 0.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 0.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 0.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 0.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 0.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 0.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 0.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 0.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
Benchmark task
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Beach
Different task instructionsCreativity, perspective and visual beauty.
Kolibri-1 12.9/100 Rank 52/53

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 71.8/100 Rank 13/53

The judgment
Kolibri-1
A recognizable sunset beach has an appealing purple-orange gradient and clean geometric edges. Birds and animals remain unresolved, terrain obscures the relationship between shore and water, and reflections are absent. Sparse detail, flat materials and limited activity keep the drawing elementary despite its tidy rendering.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.
Score breakdown
| Category | Kolibri-1 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 0.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 1.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 0.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 1.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 0.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
Benchmark task
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Ground Truth
Same task instructionsPhysical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.
Kolibri-1 21.2/100 Rank 44/53

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 41.9/100 Rank 25/53

The judgment
Kolibri-1
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Benchmark task
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Raccoon
Different task instructionsScene composition and interacting subjects.
Kolibri-1 10.0/100 Rank 53/53

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 76.8/100 Rank 4/53

The judgment
Kolibri-1
Clean shapes and a readable coral platform provide basic graphic clarity, but the animal construction remains fragmented. A recognizable raccoon riding the dog's back, connected steering and convincing water contact are not demonstrated. Sparse detail, flat subjects and absent movement effects support retaining the baseline category assessments.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.
Score breakdown
| Category | Kolibri-1 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 1.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 0.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 0.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 0.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 0.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
Benchmark task
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Pelican
Different task instructionsSubject construction and spatial relationships.
Kolibri-1 17.5/100 Rank 53/53

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 72.0/100 Rank 17/53

The judgment
Kolibri-1
Clean shapes and aligned wheels establish a readable schematic scene. Pelican likeness, riding support and bicycle mechanics remain substantially unresolved. Sparse detail and flat surfaces limit expression and volume. Strong edge and fill integrity is a separate success and does not repair the construction.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.
Score breakdown
| Category | Kolibri-1 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 1.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 1.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 1.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 1.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
Benchmark task
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.