Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) leads Iceman Contributor by 26.3 points on StealthMark, 45.5 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Space Bunny Alpha scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) scores higher on StealthMark and runs 6.5× faster in our speed test.
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
Visible panel shapes, curved sphere highlights, rounded side images and a lower continuation beneath the large left image establish recognizable local mirror structure. Their uneven arrangement, missing receding chains and absent nested imagery remain substantial shortcomings. The main sphere's framing is close, but black lacks projected separation and cyan does not establish recent apex contact.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 11.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 9.0/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 15.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
The expressive rabbits, lavender moon and diagonal ring create an appealing storybook composition with nearly all requested features. Glossy eyes and pearly highlights work well. The helmet leaves the towering ears unenclosed, the reaching arm has little joint definition, and the spread boots suggest hovering more clearly than pushing off. Repeated scalloped fur marks and broad gradients limit material depth; purple edge halos soften otherwise controlled silhouettes.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
An astronaut rabbit reaches for a carrot above a small moon while a younger companion peeks into view. The scene tests expressive characters, spatial relationships and material detail.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
The dark clothing, folded hands and muted landscape make the reference recognizable. Replication is limited by the broad frontal face, oversized head, explicit smile and simplified landscape. Arms connect coherently, but overlapping hands lack convincing finger construction. Soft gradients suggest volume and atmospheric depth; clothing folds and facial features remain schematic.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
A cheerful, coherent beach illustration with a strong sunset focal point, varied animals and readable small accessories. Connected flamingo legs and grounded foreground objects support the scene. Construction remains schematic, especially the airborne marine animal; its jump lacks clear water displacement. The sun reflection is effective but geometrically rigid, while shadows and material textures provide limited depth.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
The raccoon clearly rides on the dog's back, and the dog's paws reach a connected steering assembly. Expressive faces, controlled outlines and layered mountains make an appealing illustration. The seated anatomy and hull geometry are simplified, while the sunset has little corresponding reflection or directional shading. Curved spray conveys motion, although several splash ribbons look decorative.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
The large pouched bill clearly identifies the pelican, and the balanced bicycle silhouette makes the action readable. Attached legs reach the crank area, but overlapping feet and crank lines leave pedal contact ambiguous. Consistent wheel scale, clean contours and a restrained coastal palette support an appealing composition. Lighting and surface treatment remain simple and mostly flat.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.