STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Iceman Contributor vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Iceman Contributor by 37.8 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

19.2/100Overall rank 47/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

11.7/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

31.0/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Iceman Contributor
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 12× faster in our speed test.

  • Iceman Contributor
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Iceman Contributor: No list priceMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Iceman Contributor: Not publishedMuse Wonder: 1M
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Iceman Contributor: 46tokens/sMuse Wonder: 57012× fastertokens/s
Developer
Not publishedMeta
Released
Not published12 Oct 2026
Origin
Not publishedUnited States
Input → output
Not publishedText, image, video, audio, PDF → text

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 31 ptsTurn 7 / 20

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelIceman ContributorMuse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
0 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
3 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
1 ptsOut of lives
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Iceman Contributor 3.6/100Rank 44/48

Cleared 1 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 55 ptsTurn 25 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelIceman ContributorMuse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
2.8 ptsFinished early
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
2.2 ptsFinished early
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
4 ptsFinished early
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
5 ptsFinished early
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMuse Wonder
State at 600 ms0.5/2522.0/25
Camera and placement2.5/1512.0/15
Reflections7.5/12021.5/120
Materials and scale3.0/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMuse Wonder
Task & likeness4.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.0/107.0/10
Space & placement4.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections4.5/107.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character4.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects4.5/106.5/10
Visual integrity4.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Iceman Contributor

Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMuse Wonder
Task & likeness1.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction1.5/105.5/10
Space & placement2.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections2.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail2.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character2.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMuse Wonder
Task & likeness7.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/109.0/10
Artistry & character3.5/107.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity5.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Different task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMuse Wonder
Task & likeness2.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.0/105.5/10
Space & placement3.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail3.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character2.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects4.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity2.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Iceman Contributor

A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryIceman ContributorMuse Wonder
Task & likeness4.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.5/106.0/10
Space & placement3.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail4.5/108.5/10
Artistry & character3.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects4.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.