Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Wonder leads Iceman Contributor by 37.8 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 12× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 22.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 21.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.