Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads Iceman Contributor by 28.7 points on StealthMark, 47.9 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on StealthMark and runs 2.5× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiMo-V2.6-Pro ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The main framing and visible paint-contact story are well supported. Major optical omissions dominate the result: sparse repetitions, undersized first images, missing outer chains and absent curved nested imagery prevent a coherent mirror-room system. The metallic forms remain convincing in volume but have a soft illustrative finish.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 23.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 19.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
An appealing rabbit with balanced framing, expressive eyes and purposeful costume accents. Simple frontal construction limits anatomical and spatial accomplishment. The orange orb provides an effective luminous focal point, but unreadable wrist connections weaken the requested gestures and prevent stronger integrity credit.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The portrait is recognizable through its dark silhouette, slight smile and muted landscape, but replication is weak. A frontal, oversized head and symmetric torso replace the reference's turned seated pose; angular, separated hands omit its central gesture. Smooth shading maintains coherence while anatomical detail, depth and material rendering remain basic.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A readable sunset beach with clear requested subjects, appealing framing and purposeful accessories. Schematic anatomy, flattened foreground objects, repetitive water highlights and sparse directional shadows limit construction and physical depth. The kite's unresolved anchor also constrains integrity.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
A coherent, cheerful cartoon with recognizable animals, readable steering contact and useful small details. The dog's orientation follows the craft more successfully than a wholly frontal pose would. Simple anatomy, weak raccoon grip and compressed seating contacts still limit physical credibility. Gradients and spray provide polish without resolving complex construction.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
The distinctive bill, continuous silhouette and detailed wheels establish a readable pelican cyclist. Shaped feathers and soft shading add character, but jointless legs, crowded pedal contacts, absent steering contact and loosely directional lighting limit the construction. The comparisons support retaining the baseline category scores.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.