Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads Iceman Contributor by 25.4 points on StealthMark, 44.6 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on StealthMark and runs 12× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMiMo-V2.6-Flash ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The faint lower sphere image provides limited reflection evidence through reversed paint-color ordering. The wider reflection system and nested room imagery are absent. The colored beads do not resolve the required impact and transport history, while displaced paint positions and weak material rendering further limit the result.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 5.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 4.5/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 6.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The centered rabbit has an appealing alert expression, a balanced silhouette, and a restrained technological palette. Outfit panels and orbital accents are cleanly resolved. The orb-holding paw has an ambiguous grip, the ears lack distinct angular bends, and the halo's interlocking construction is unclear. Soft shading suggests volume, but materials and spatial depth remain simplified.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
A small rabbit in an explorer outfit floats with a luminous orb. The scene tests character anatomy, pose and the placement of geometric forms around it.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The dark clothing, long hair, folded hands and hazy landscape make the reference recognizable. Replication is limited by the frontal symmetry, elongated face, wide staring eyes and downturned mouth. Both arms connect to the hands, but the overlapping palms and looplike fingers are poorly resolved. Soft facial shading provides some volume; the clothing and landscape remain broad, simplified shapes.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The warm sunset, aligned reflection, framing palms and playful beach animals create an appealing, coherent scene. Small toys and shells remain readable. Drawing is simplified: animals have limited volume, water uses repetitive horizontal strokes, and foreground shadows do not consistently follow the central sun. Clean execution supports a competent illustration, but depth and material rendering remain modest.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The raccoon riding the dog reads clearly, with expressive faces and a cheerful waterscape. The steering action is weak: no paw reaches the handlebar, which meets the dog's muzzle. The vehicle resembles a thin board with a steering post. Overlapping limbs obscure anatomy, while limited shadows, reflections and surface modeling keep the scene flat.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The pelican is immediately recognizable, with an expressive eye and prominent pouch, and the landscape provides clear framing. Clean outlines and spokes support the cheerful illustration. Both feet visibly miss the bicycle's pedal mechanism, weakening the riding action. Simplified machinery, shallow depth and loosely directional shading limit the requested masterpiece quality.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.