Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Iceman Contributor leads MAI-Thinking-1 by 5.1 points on StealthMark, 19.2 to 14.1. Iceman Contributor and MAI-Thinking-1 each lead on 4 of 9 benchmarks, with 1 tied. MAI-Thinking-1 leads Foresight. Iceman Contributor scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Iceman Contributor scores higher on StealthMark. MAI-Thinking-1 runs 2× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMAI-Thinking-1 ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
MAI-Thinking-1
The small paint features and convex shading deserve moderate material credit. The sphere remains undersized and low, with black unusually close to its apex. Crimson and cyan do not establish the required impact histories. Faint reflected echoes supply limited optical evidence, while the defining recursive room, nested sphere and emitter structures remain unestablished.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MAI-Thinking-1 |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 3.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 2.5/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 4.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
MAI-Thinking-1
A recognizable lantern-and-moth illustration with appealing coloured wings and tidy outer contours. Simple construction, a small focal subject and crowded overlaps limit character and depth. The face, six-leg anatomy, seedling and antenna-driven watering joke remain insufficiently readable.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MAI-Thinking-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
MAI-Thinking-1
A fluffy moth tends a lantern greenhouse amid a gardening mishap. The scene tests insect anatomy, expressive action, translucent wings and the interaction of light with small objects.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
MAI-Thinking-1
A recognizable Mona Lisa motif emerges from dark hair, a pale face and a landscape band. Replication remains weak: the oversized frontal head, broad smile, unresolved torso and missing crossed-hand anatomy diverge substantially from the reference. Simple fills and sparse strokes provide limited volume, material definition or painterly complexity.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MAI-Thinking-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 0.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
MAI-Thinking-1
A coherent, cheerful beach scene with balanced placement, clean shapes and controlled sunset colours. Animals, birds and playful accessories are recognizable, but basic dolphin construction, weak grounding, schematic reflections and sparse material detail limit the drawing's accomplishment.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MAI-Thinking-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MAI-Thinking-1
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
MAI-Thinking-1
The recognizable raccoon and clean, shaded forms make a readable cartoon. The dog's steering remains undemonstrated, while ambiguous seating contacts and a minimally constructed craft weaken the central interaction. Controlled gradients and edges deserve credit, but anatomy, purposeful detail and water displacement remain basic.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MAI-Thinking-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
MAI-Thinking-1
A recognizable pelican and bicycle combine clean rounded forms, expressive facial details and effective surface shading. Aligned wheels and soft shadows establish placement, but unresolved pedal engagement, absent steering contact and sparse drivetrain construction weaken the riding action. Limited feather complexity and shallow space constrain an otherwise appealing illustration.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | MAI-Thinking-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.