Iceman Contributor 3.2/100Rank 47/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Ling 3.1 Flash leads Iceman Contributor by 23.0 points on StealthMark, 42.2 to 19.2. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Ling 3.1 Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Ling 3.1 Flash scores higher on StealthMark and runs 2.5× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceLing 3.1 Flash ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Iceman Contributor
The image provides limited evidence through rounded volume, faint wall strips and floor echoes. Its main sphere is small and low, the paint beads do not establish the required interaction history, and most of the defining mirror structure is missing.
Ling 3.1 Flash
Central placement, separate airborne black paint and the elongated crimson coating earn substantial state and placement credit. Cyan contact remains unresolved. A few isolated sphere images provide limited optical evidence, while the defining repeated mirror structure is missing. Readable opaque metallic volume and restrained paint scale justify increased material credit. Core: 61.5/170; including the floor reward: 61.5/180.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 0.5/25 | 22.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.5/15 | 13.5/15 |
| Reflections | 7.5/120 | 18.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Iceman Contributor
The crystal crown, cyan eyes and blue faceting communicate an icy fantasy character. Anatomical readability is substantially weaker: the ringed torso, crowded facial construction and fingerless appendages do not resolve the requested childlike crouch or pouncing gesture. Sparse surface detail and shallow shading further limit the result.
Ling 3.1 Flash
An appealing, coherent storybook ant with a clear expression, complete silhouette and readable signal mechanism. Clean curves and warm accents support the composition, while simplified joints, schematic hardware, limited material differentiation and modest light interaction constrain its finish.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Iceman Contributor
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Ling 3.1 Flash
An ant tending signals in a miniature workshop tests insect anatomy, purposeful gestures and the placement of small objects in a lit environment.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
The portrait retains a dark silhouette against an earthy landscape, but replication is weak. The frontal body, elongated facial proportions and undifferentiated hands lose the reference's defining pose and likeness. Basic gradients and layered hills provide some coherence, with little anatomical or painterly detail.
Ling 3.1 Flash
A basic, uneven Mona Lisa interpretation with a clear facial focal point, articulated eyes and modest tonal volume. Weak likeness, oversized head proportions, unclear shoulders, curled bare arms and indistinct hands limit replication. The compressed composition and rectangular torso weaken an otherwise coherent earthy palette.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 1.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 1.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Iceman Contributor
A coherent sunset beach with recognizable animals, playful details and effective palm framing. Connected silhouettes and layered scenery support modest construction and placement credit. Jointless figures, limited foreshortening and an inadequately separated sun and reflection keep the execution basic despite its attractive color.
Ling 3.1 Flash
A coherent sunset illustration with harmonious color, clean silhouettes and readable beach details. Its calm composition works well, while playful activity is modest. Simplified animal anatomy, shallow shoreline layering, repetitive foliage and a geometric reflection limit drawing sophistication and naturalism.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Iceman Contributor
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Ling 3.1 Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Iceman Contributor
The sunset palette and red hull establish an appealing setting, but the central interaction remains unresolved. Overlapping bodies obscure the dog, supported seating is unclear, and no readable paw-to-control grip demonstrates steering. Simple construction, weak environmental lighting and loosely described spray limit depth and finish.
Ling 3.1 Flash
An appealing sunset cartoon with recognizable animals, expressive faces and coherent landscape layers. The sky and warm water streaks provide its strongest rendering. Ambiguous seated support, stiff forelegs, a shallow hull and an unclear steering connection limit construction. Clean shapes and readable accessories add finish, while restrained spray and flat surfaces limit material and motion effects.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 2.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Iceman Contributor
A recognizable pelican and bicycle sit within an appealing sunset composition. Feather contours, bill shape and atmospheric colour provide character, but disconnected-looking leg origins, unclear pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the central riding action. Consistent wheel alignment establishes a side view without resolving the rider's support.
Ling 3.1 Flash
A clean, appealing pelican illustration with a readable bicycle and coherent landscape. Bill shading, feather layers and faint wheel shadows provide modest depth. Uncertain pedal contact, simplified leg construction and limited material rendering keep the result within competent illustration quality.
| Category | Iceman Contributor | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.