Glyph Cluster 6.4/100Rank 44/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Wonder leads Glyph Cluster by 38.1 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 18.9. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 8.3× faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Glyph Cluster
Rounded sphere volume, compact colored forms and crimson-below-cyan ordering provide limited agreement. The visible paint does not establish the required interaction history, the sphere and black blob are displaced from the prescribed projection, and most of the defining mirror-room structure is missing or unresolved. The faint reflection echoes earn limited optical credit.
Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 5.0/25 | 22.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 3.0/15 | 12.0/15 |
| Reflections | 8.0/120 | 21.5/120 |
| Materials and scale | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Glyph Cluster
A charming palette and three expressive companions make the concept recognizable. The dominant paper enclosure overwhelms the small group, the plum character lacks a clear brace silhouette, and the cuddle remains difficult to trace. Sparse furnishings, ambiguous folds and generalized shading limit the promised lived-in richness and tactile depth.
Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Glyph Cluster
Punctuation-shaped companions gather inside a curled paper home. The scene tests expressive silhouettes, close interaction and the coherence of a detailed miniature environment.
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Glyph Cluster
The portrait has a continuous body silhouette, attached sleeves and hands, and simple landscape depth. Its oversized pale head enclosure nearly erases the expression, while separated fists, ochre clothing and frontal construction weaken Mona Lisa likeness. Sparse detail, flat materials and ambiguous facial layers leave the drawing seriously unresolved.
Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 0.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 1.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 1.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 0.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 1.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Glyph Cluster
A cheerful, recognizable beach illustration with playful accessories and mostly clean silhouettes. Sunset colors and soft glow supply atmosphere, but abbreviated anatomy, unexplained airborne animals, weak ground contact and absent water reflections limit physical coherence. Small details add interest without consistently resolving construction or materials.
Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Glyph Cluster
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Glyph Cluster
Recognizable animals and clean shapes give the scene charm, but the requested steering action is visibly incomplete. Simplified joints, weak vehicle construction and uncertain water contact limit physical coherence. Flat lighting, sparse functional detail and a small focal group keep the illustration basic despite its tidy edges.
Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Glyph Cluster
A readable cartoon with open framing, aligned bicycle wheels and modest atmospheric effects. Pelican likeness is approximate, while the narrow neck, crowded feet, absent steering contact and unclear drivetrain weaken the riding action. Clean shapes help presentation, but shallow space and inconsistent shading limit the finish.
Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
| Category | Glyph Cluster | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 4.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.