STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Glyph Cluster vs MISSINGNO.

MISSINGNO. scores 15.1 points higher overall (38.0 vs 22.9). MISSINGNO. scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
Model guide ↗

Overall StealthMark

22.9/100
38.0/100

General Intelligence

16.1/100
33.6/100

Visual Intelligence

31.0/100
43.3/100

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

Glyph Cluster14.1/100

Glyph Cluster: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Rounded sphere volume, compact colored forms and crimson-below-cyan ordering provide limited agreement. The visible paint does not establish the required interaction history, the sphere and black blob are displaced from the prescribed projection, and most of the defining mirror-room structure is missing or unresolved. The faint reflection echoes earn limited optical credit.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

MISSINGNO.24.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryGlyph ClusterMISSINGNO.
State at 600 ms7.5/2511.5/25
Camera and placement3.0/157.0/15
Reflections8.0/12012.0/120
Materials and scale3.0/105.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different task instructions

Glyph Cluster32.4/100

Glyph Cluster: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A charming palette and three expressive companions make the concept recognizable. The dominant paper enclosure overwhelms the small group, the plum character lacks a clear brace silhouette, and the cuddle remains difficult to trace. Sparse furnishings, ambiguous folds and generalized shading limit the promised lived-in richness and tactile depth.

Benchmark task

Punctuation-shaped companions gather inside a curled paper home. The scene tests expressive silhouettes, close interaction and the coherence of a detailed miniature environment.

MISSINGNO.49.7/100

MISSINGNO.: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Benchmark task

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Compare category scores
CategoryGlyph ClusterMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness3.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/104.5/10
Space & placement4.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections3.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail4.5/104.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/104.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/106.0/10

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Glyph Cluster11.7/100

Glyph Cluster: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The portrait has a continuous body silhouette, attached sleeves and hands, and simple landscape depth. Its oversized pale head enclosure nearly erases the expression, while separated fists, ochre clothing and frontal construction weaken Mona Lisa likeness. Sparse detail, flat materials and ambiguous facial layers leave the drawing seriously unresolved.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

MISSINGNO.28.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Compare category scores
CategoryGlyph ClusterMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness2.0/101.5/10
Anatomy & construction0.5/102.5/10
Space & placement2.0/102.5/10
Light & reflections1.0/103.0/10
Purposeful detail1.0/102.0/10
Artistry & character0.5/103.5/10
Materials & effects1.0/102.0/10
Visual integrity3.0/106.0/10

Beach

Same task instructions

Glyph Cluster46.3/100

Glyph Cluster: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A cheerful, recognizable beach illustration with playful accessories and mostly clean silhouettes. Sunset colors and soft glow supply atmosphere, but abbreviated anatomy, unexplained airborne animals, weak ground contact and absent water reflections limit physical coherence. Small details add interest without consistently resolving construction or materials.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

MISSINGNO.43.9/100

MISSINGNO.: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryGlyph ClusterMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness6.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/104.0/10
Space & placement5.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/103.0/10
Artistry & character4.0/103.0/10
Materials & effects4.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity5.0/103.5/10

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Glyph Cluster17.9/100

Glyph Cluster: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

MISSINGNO.44.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Glyph Cluster42.8/100

Glyph Cluster: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Recognizable animals and clean shapes give the scene charm, but the requested steering action is visibly incomplete. Simplified joints, weak vehicle construction and uncertain water contact limit physical coherence. Flat lighting, sparse functional detail and a small focal group keep the illustration basic despite its tidy edges.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

MISSINGNO.57.5/100

MISSINGNO.: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Compare category scores
CategoryGlyph ClusterMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness6.0/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.0/105.0/10
Space & placement4.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections2.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/106.0/10
Artistry & character4.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects3.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity5.5/107.0/10

Pelican

Same task instructions

Glyph Cluster44.3/100

Glyph Cluster: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A readable cartoon with open framing, aligned bicycle wheels and modest atmospheric effects. Pelican likeness is approximate, while the narrow neck, crowded feet, absent steering contact and unclear drivetrain weaken the riding action. Clean shapes help presentation, but shallow space and inconsistent shading limit the finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

MISSINGNO.58.8/100

MISSINGNO.: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Compare category scores
CategoryGlyph ClusterMISSINGNO.
Task & likeness6.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction3.0/105.5/10
Space & placement6.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections3.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/104.5/10
Visual integrity6.0/106.5/10