STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Minimax M3 vs MISSINGNO.

MISSINGNO. scores 1.0 points higher overall (38.0 vs 37.0). MISSINGNO. leads General Intelligence; Minimax M3 leads Visual Intelligence. MISSINGNO. scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
Model guide ↗

Overall StealthMark

37.0/100
38.0/100

General Intelligence

29.3/100
33.6/100

Visual Intelligence

46.3/100
43.3/100

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

Minimax M330.6/100

Minimax M3: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, aligned left wall image, smaller lower-left continuation and partially occluded floor image provide recognizable local mirror coherence. Cyan remains airborne, the main sphere resembles white marble, and missing right-side imagery, recursive optics and panel mappings leave the scene substantially incomplete.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

MISSINGNO.24.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered sphere, separate airborne black blob and cyan-above-crimson ordering provide limited valid structure. The colored beads do not establish the required impact and transport histories. One dim floor image supports a small part of the optical system, while the defining wall repetitions, nested sphere imagery and emitter mappings are missing. Rounded volume and some gloss earn material credit, tempered by soft surface appearance and excessive paint-bead scale.

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMinimax M3MISSINGNO.
State at 600 ms9.0/2511.5/25
Camera and placement14.5/157.0/15
Reflections22.0/12012.0/120
Materials and scale5.0/105.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Selfie

Different task instructions

Minimax M358.2/100

Minimax M3: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The oversized coral M silhouette dominates clearly, with an expressive charcoal face and appealing miniature body. Limbs connect coherently and the cube reads clearly. The lowered left hand only loosely suggests the requested hip pose. Thin highlights and simple gradients provide limited sculptural volume; the cube's glow and grounding shadow are restrained.

Benchmark task

A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.

MISSINGNO.49.7/100

MISSINGNO.: Selfie SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

An appealing purple character with a readable pleased expression and raised-moustache joke. Smooth shading and clean contours support the simple design, but indistinct mitten grips, minimally textured curls and an uncompressed strap weaken the requested physical interaction. The jelly suggests gloss more convincingly than translucency.

Benchmark task

A glossy purple jelly struggles with an oversized fake moustache at a playful checkpoint. The scene tests comic expression, physical contact and the appearance of a soft translucent body.

Compare category scores
CategoryMinimax M3MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness8.0/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/104.5/10
Space & placement7.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail4.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character4.0/104.5/10
Materials & effects4.0/104.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/106.0/10

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Minimax M319.7/100

Minimax M3: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The centered portrait, dark hair and muted palette suggest Mona Lisa, but characteristic likeness and pose are poorly reproduced. The broad oval face lacks her subtle smile; rounded shoulders and a lone mittenlike hand leave the crossed-arm construction unresolved. Warm shading supplies some volume, while blurred landscape bands, generic clothing and indistinct features limit the drawing.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

MISSINGNO.28.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

Clean contours, connected body forms and gentle gradients support a basic, coherent portrait. Likeness remains weak: the face dominates the body, the seated angle is lost, and crossed hands become dark lobes without traceable wrists or fingers. Readable facial details add some drawing complexity, but clothing, landscape and material treatment remain sparse.

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Compare category scores
CategoryMinimax M3MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness2.5/101.5/10
Anatomy & construction1.5/102.5/10
Space & placement2.5/102.5/10
Light & reflections3.0/103.0/10
Purposeful detail1.5/102.0/10
Artistry & character1.5/103.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/102.0/10
Visual integrity2.0/106.0/10

Beach

Different task instructions

Minimax M358.0/100

Minimax M3: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A cheerful, coherent sunset illustration with framing palms, warm gradients and an aligned sun reflection. Animals and beach toys add character, but their construction remains basic. The sailboat appears suspended above the water horizon, while absent cast shadows weaken foreground contact. Clean geometric shapes provide polish without substantial texture or depth.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

MISSINGNO.43.9/100

MISSINGNO.: Beach SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent sunset beach with clear requested subjects, balanced framing and clean shapes. The aligned solar reflection and warm gradients establish atmosphere. Primitive animal construction, ambiguous furniture, sparse depth cues and minimally developed surfaces limit its drawing complexity and physical richness.

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Compare category scores
CategoryMinimax M3MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness8.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/104.0/10
Space & placement6.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail6.0/103.0/10
Artistry & character5.0/103.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/103.5/10

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Minimax M327.1/100

Minimax M3: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

MISSINGNO.44.1/100

MISSINGNO.: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Minimax M366.2/100

Minimax M3: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The raccoon sits above the dog's back, and the dog reaches toward the jet ski controls. Expressive faces and a vivid sunset make the scene appealing. Construction is simplified: the dog's paws and steering grip are ambiguous, the hull is shallow, and blurred wake patches give limited water displacement. Sunset glow exceeds the lighting modeled on the riders.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

MISSINGNO.57.5/100

MISSINGNO.: Raccoon SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The requested interaction reads clearly through recognizable animals, expressive faces and a coherent hull-water relationship. Clean curves and readable accessories give the cartoon polish. Partly unresolved grips and supporting contacts limit physical construction; modest shape complexity, weak directional lighting and schematic water constrain its finish.

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Compare category scores
CategoryMinimax M3MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness8.0/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/105.0/10
Space & placement6.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/106.0/10
Artistry & character6.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.0/10

Pelican

Different task instructions

Minimax M367.3/100

Minimax M3: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

The pelican's long bill, pouch and curved neck read clearly, and the warm sunset gives the composition appeal. Bicycle construction weakens the riding action: feet do not convincingly engage the pedals, crank connections are unclear, and body support is unresolved. Clean silhouettes and orderly spokes provide a competent illustrative finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

MISSINGNO.58.8/100

MISSINGNO.: Pelican SVG benchmark
Researcher observations

A coherent, cheerful illustration with recognizable pelican features, balanced composition, clean contours and useful small details. Its controlled curves and layered wheels demonstrate competent drawing skill. Ambiguous pedal and steering contacts, sparse drivetrain construction and weak directional lighting limit the riding mechanics and finish.

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.

Compare category scores
CategoryMinimax M3MISSINGNO.
Task & likeness8.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/105.5/10
Space & placement6.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections6.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail7.5/105.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/106.5/10