Gemma 4 31B 30.2/100Rank 30/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads Gemma 4 31B by 20.1 points on StealthMark, 45.9 to 25.8. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on StealthMark and takes 3.8× more context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemma 4 31B ↗MiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Gemma 4 31B
The sphere's volume, separate airborne black blob and vertical color ordering are readable. The large, low sphere, plain surrounding planes and absent nested optical imagery leave the central geometric and reflection requirements unsupported. Paint contact and transport remain unresolved. Material credit recognizes the visible convex shading, highlights and distinct surface colors while retaining deductions for the schematic finish and oversized blobs.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 11.0/25 | 20.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 3.0/15 | 10.0/15 |
| Reflections | 0.0/120 | 24.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 5.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Gemma 4 31B
A clean, appealing luminous mascot with coherent body continuity and a readable jar-hugging pose. Rounded highlights, smooth gradients and balanced framing work well. The teardrop silhouette, modest eyes and nearly even grin only partly satisfy the character brief; sparse jar construction and simple geometry limit sophistication.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
Gemma 4 31B
A small luminous creature proudly holding an empty glass jar tests expression, transparent materials and the balance of character and prop.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Gemma 4 31B
The portrait is recognizable through its silhouette, palette and smile, with clean execution of simple shapes. Replication remains weak: the face and pose differ markedly, hands become fingerless ovals, clothing lacks construction, and the landscape loses its atmospheric detail. Basic gradients provide limited volume.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Gemma 4 31B
A coherent beach illustration with clean silhouettes, a sweeping shoreline and an effective sunset palette. Requested subjects are recognizable, but primitive animal construction, sparse detail, unsupported palm placement and schematic reflections limit drawing sophistication and physical credibility.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Gemma 4 31B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Gemma 4 31B
Clean, simple silhouettes communicate a raccoon riding on a dog. Limited animal specificity, absent steering controls and a flat platform weaken the requested scene. Small facial marks provide purposeful detail, while unresolved support, flat lighting and schematic water restrict physical coherence. Primitive but coherent construction supports basic drawing quality.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 1.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Gemma 4 31B
A clean, readable illustration with balanced placement and coherent basic geometry. The sky gradient and ground shadow establish diffuse illumination. Primitive shapes and sparse detail limit artistry, while unclear leg attachment, missing pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the riding action.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.
| Category | Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 4.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.