STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads Gemma 4 26B A4B by 29.4 points on StealthMark, 45.9 to 16.5. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

16.5/100Overall rank 50/53
45.9/100Overall rank 24/53

General Intelligence

9.4/100
35.8/100

Visual Intelligence

28.9/100
62.6/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B

Open or local

Local modelOpen model · Apache 2.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on StealthMark and takes 3.8× more context.

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Gemma 4 26B A4B: $0.30$0.09 inputMiniMax M3.1 Flash: No list price
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Gemma 4 26B A4B: 256KMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1M3.8× larger
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Gemma 4 26B A4B: 95tokens/sMiniMax M3.1 Flash: Not measured
SizeTotal and active parameters
Gemma 4 26B A4B: 25.2B3.8B activeMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 428B23B active
Developer
Google DeepMindMiniMax
Released
2 Apr 2026Not published
Origin
United StatesNot published
Input → output
Text, image → textText, image, video → text
Architecture
Mixture-of-Experts multimodal transformer with interleaved sliding-window and global attentionMixture-of-Experts with MiniMax Sparse Attention and native multimodal encoder

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemma 4 26B A4B ↗MiniMax M3.1 Flash ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemma 4 26B A4B 4.1/100Rank 46/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 32 ptsTurn 9 / 20

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 30.7/100Rank 28/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelGemma 4 26B A4BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Level 1Second Thoughts
3 ptsOut of lives
6 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
2 ptsOut of lives
5 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
2 ptsOut of lives
9 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemma 4 26B A4B 4.5/100Rank 41/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 53 ptsTurn 40 / 40

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 21.9/100Rank 38/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 517.2 ptsTurn 24 / 40

Points per level

LevelGemma 4 26B A4BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Level 1Hold the door
3 ptsCleared1 beacon left
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
6.2 ptsFinished early
8.6 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 3Relay vault
15.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
5 ptsOut of turns
Level 4Passing bay
11.8 ptsFinished early
4.4 ptsFinished early
Level 5Second thoughts
3 ptsOut of turns
17.2 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Separate airborne black and contact-compatible paint flattening earn partial state credit. Settlement, adhesion and differentiated paint transport remain unresolved. The enlarged, low sphere and thin lamp strip substantially depart from the required camera, while the defining mirror structure is missing. Weak material appearance and oversized black paint limit material credit. The retained base total is 18/170; the floor-damage reward is 0, giving 18/180.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sphere placement, separate airborne black blob, recent cyan contact and elongated crimson aftermath support the required gross physical state. The reflection system remains severely incomplete: isolated side images, broad metallic bands and sparse light patches replace extensive mirror repetitions and curved nested imagery.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
State at 600 ms10.0/2520.0/25
Camera and placement2.0/1510.0/15
Reflections0.0/12024.0/120
Materials and scale2.5/108.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

An appealing, readable sparkle-creature with luminous colour and expressive eyes. Simple geometric construction limits sophistication, while sharp body points, ambiguous hand contact and a minimally resolved jar weaken the requested soft, plump character and treasure-presenting pose.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

The sculptural M, confident grin and miniature theatrical pose closely fulfill the brief. Controlled gradients and clean shapes give the character volume and appeal. Moderate drawing complexity, an apparently separated shoe and ambiguous grounding limit the finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness5.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/106.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/106.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/105.0/10
Artistry & character4.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/106.0/10

Benchmark task

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A small luminous creature proudly holding an empty glass jar tests expression, transparent materials and the balance of character and prop.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A small robot with an oversized angular head presents a glowing object. The scene tests character proportions, gesture and contrasting materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

The centered dark-haired portrait provides a loose reference cue, but its elongated, nearly featureless face and undifferentiated torso fall far short of replication. Crossed hands, the subtle smile, clothing structure and landscape are unresolved. Clean silhouettes and soft gradients provide limited coherence.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A coherent decorative portrait combines layered hair, garment contours, linked trim and atmospheric scenery. These provide meaningful drawing complexity, but likeness remains limited by the frontal elongated face and altered clothing. Compressed hands, abrupt facial shading and cluttered local edges leave the portrait uneven.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness0.5/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/104.5/10
Space & placement1.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections2.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail1.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character2.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects1.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity4.5/105.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A clean, balanced sunset scene demonstrates the beach, birds and a centered reflection. Animals and play receive only minimal treatment. Coherent layers and controlled gradients support readability, but unresolved aquatic anatomy, sparse details and weak surface modeling keep the drawing basic.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled, detailed beach illustration with expressive animals, coherent depth and accomplished foliage and accessory drawing. Its warm palette and varied contours sustain visual interest. Simplified anatomy and object volumes limit physical conviction, while reflection streaks crossing dry-looking sand and generic shadows weaken the lighting.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness3.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/107.0/10
Space & placement3.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/106.0/10
Purposeful detail1.0/108.0/10
Artistry & character1.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity6.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

The animal stack is recognizable, and clean silhouettes support a basic illustration. Steering is not depicted, while the craft's construction and water contact remain unresolved. Sparse anatomical and material detail limit the finish. The sky gradient and glow provide atmospheric lighting, but the subjects lack corresponding modeling.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

An expressive, coherent cartoon clearly demonstrates the requested riding and steering relationship. Layered animal shapes, readable vehicle depth and purposeful facial details support its drawing quality. Ambiguous grips, sparse cast shadows and simplified material responses limit physical precision.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness2.5/109.0/10
Anatomy & construction2.5/108.0/10
Space & placement4.0/108.0/10
Light & reflections3.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail2.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/107.5/10
Materials & effects2.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A clean, balanced icon suggests a pelican riding a bicycle. Continuous contours and restrained colors support its finish, but the abbreviated bill, undifferentiated body, unresolved riding contacts and incomplete bicycle mechanism limit likeness and construction. Sparse detail and flat lighting keep the drawing basic despite its clarity.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

A controlled coastal illustration with a clear pelican silhouette, detailed wheels and accomplished feather and bill drawing. Continuous body construction and grounded wheels support the scene. Ambiguous leg, pedal and steering contacts weaken the riding mechanics; approximate directional lighting and simplified materials limit physical conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task & likeness3.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction3.0/106.5/10
Space & placement5.0/108.0/10
Light & reflections3.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail3.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character2.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects2.5/107.0/10
Visual integrity5.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.