Gemma 4 26B A4B 4.1/100Rank 46/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Gemma 4 26B A4B by 40.2 points on StealthMark, 56.7 to 16.5. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Gemma 4 26B A4B is 33× cheaper per output token. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on StealthMark, takes 4× more context and runs 23% faster in our speed test.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemma 4 26B A4B ↗Kimi K3.1 Pro ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Gemma 4 26B A4B
Separate airborne black and contact-compatible paint flattening earn partial state credit. Settlement, adhesion and differentiated paint transport remain unresolved. The enlarged, low sphere and thin lamp strip substantially depart from the required camera, while the defining mirror structure is missing. Weak material appearance and oversized black paint limit material credit. The retained base total is 18/170; the floor-damage reward is 0, giving 18/180.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The settled sphere, separate airborne black paint and crimson-before-cyan interaction are supported, with a modest crimson travel overshoot. A shared downward framing displacement remains after accounting for the square canvas. The principal limitation is the reflection system: sparse sphere copies and generic curved bands omit most of the ordered mirror-room structure. Materials receive a small upward revision because bounded bright images and dark bands visibly establish some polish, while soft shading and bulky paint remain separate weaknesses.
| Category | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 10.0/25 | 23.5/25 |
| Camera and placement | 2.0/15 | 10.5/15 |
| Reflections | 0.0/120 | 26.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 2.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Gemma 4 26B A4B
An appealing, readable sparkle-creature with luminous colour and expressive eyes. Simple geometric construction limits sophistication, while sharp body points, ambiguous hand contact and a minimally resolved jar weaken the requested soft, plump character and treasure-presenting pose.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The transformed reflection, attentive pose and constellation anatomy clearly communicate introspection. Purposeful fine details enrich a coherent composition. Tubular limbs, crowded lower-body overlaps, shallow depth and limited cast lighting keep the overall execution within the competent range.
| Category | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 4.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
Gemma 4 26B A4B
A small luminous creature proudly holding an empty glass jar tests expression, transparent materials and the balance of character and prop.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
An imagined creature encounters its reflection. The scene tests original character design, visual self-interpretation and the relationship between a subject and its reflected image.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Gemma 4 26B A4B
The centered dark-haired portrait provides a loose reference cue, but its elongated, nearly featureless face and undifferentiated torso fall far short of replication. Crossed hands, the subtle smile, clothing structure and landscape are unresolved. Clean silhouettes and soft gradients provide limited coherence.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
A coherent, recognizable interpretation with controlled color and readable landscape layers. Replication is limited by the frontal seated construction, elongated facial proportions and oversized, weakly articulated hands. Smooth shading supplies some volume but little of the reference's subtle expression, fabric structure or atmospheric transitions.
| Category | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 0.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 1.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 1.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 1.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 4.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Gemma 4 26B A4B
A clean, balanced sunset scene demonstrates the beach, birds and a centered reflection. Animals and play receive only minimal treatment. Coherent layers and controlled gradients support readability, but unresolved aquatic anatomy, sparse details and weak surface modeling keep the drawing basic.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
A coherent, playful beach illustration with readable animals, an organized composition and an aligned sunset reflection. Connected silhouettes, sand texture and atmospheric effects demonstrate controlled execution. Simplified joints, flattened foreground viewpoints and inconsistent shadows limit anatomical and spatial credibility.
| Category | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 1.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 1.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Gemma 4 26B A4B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Gemma 4 26B A4B
The animal stack is recognizable, and clean silhouettes support a basic illustration. Steering is not depicted, while the craft's construction and water contact remain unresolved. Sparse anatomical and material detail limit the finish. The sky gradient and glow provide atmospheric lighting, but the subjects lack corresponding modeling.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The additional comparisons support retaining the assessment. Readable steering, shaped animal contours and purposeful details coexist with simplified joints, a frontal passenger whose seated weight is weakly conveyed, and limited physical lighting. The angled craft establishes more depth than the riding pose resolves.
| Category | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 2.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 2.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 2.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Gemma 4 26B A4B
A clean, balanced icon suggests a pelican riding a bicycle. Continuous contours and restrained colors support its finish, but the abbreviated bill, undifferentiated body, unresolved riding contacts and incomplete bicycle mechanism limit likeness and construction. Sparse detail and flat lighting keep the drawing basic despite its clarity.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
A characterful coastal illustration with controlled contours and varied feather, accessory and bicycle detail. Layered scenery and subtle shading enrich the presentation. Soft leg articulation, unresolved riding contacts, shallow depth and generalized lighting limit physical precision.
| Category | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 3.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 3.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 2.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 2.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.