stealthmodels.

MODEL BENCHMARKS

Kimi K3.1 Pro: Beach

First model of Moonshot AI's K3.1 series: Kimi K3 with much larger post-training compute, a million-token context, image and video input and a faster Highspeed variant. Moonshot plans to release the weights by 4 November 2026.

DATASHEET

Kimi K3.1 Pro specs and pricing

A good fit forLong-horizon coding agents and game builds, scripted 3D and CAD modeling in tools such as Blender, and financial document research. Highspeed suits interactive work at double the token price.

Kimi K3.1 ProOther modelsMedian

PriceDeveloper API, input / output per 1M tokens
$2 / $10Cheaper than 8 of 43 others
Context windowTokens in one request
1,048,576Joint largest with 18 others
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
117 tokens/sFaster than 19 of 50 others
Developer
Moonshot AI
Released
23 Oct 2026
Family
Kimi K3.1
Open model
Yes
Local model
No
Origin
China
Parameters
2.8TEstimated
Active parameters
104BEstimated
Max output
1,048,576 tokens
Input → output
Text, image, video → text
API model ID
kimi-k3.1-pro
Architecture
Post-trained version of Kimi K3, a Mixture-of-Experts model
All prices and providers3

Kimi API (Moonshot AI); input 2 USD/1M; cached read 0.20/1M; output 10/1M. Highspeed: input 4, cached read 0.20, output 20

  • OpenRouterObserved 2026-10-23
    Input $2Output $10Cached read $0.2

    per 1M tokens

    moonshotai/kimi-k3.1-pro
  • Kimi API (Moonshot AI)Observed 2026-10-23
    Input $2Output $10Cached read $0.2Cached write $2

    per 1M tokens

    Available

    kimi-k3.1-pro
  • Kimi API (Moonshot AI)Observed 2026-10-23
    Input $4Output $20Cached read $0.2Cached write $4

    per 1M tokens

    Available

    kimi-k3.1-pro-highspeed
Measurements and sources7

Related models

  1. Kimi K3.1 Pro56.7This model
  2. Kimi K350.7Compare Kimi K3.1 Pro and Kimi K3

StealthMark score

StealthMark measures how well a model’s abilities carry over to original, demanding tasks it could not have trained for: physical and spatial reasoning, planning across many steps, and precise visual work. How StealthMark works explains every benchmark, what it tests and why it is hard.

General Intelligence

The ability to reason, plan, solve problems and understand how things relate and behave. A high score means it thinks hard problems through, from careful analysis to plans that span many steps.

Visual Intelligence

The ability to understand visual intent and turn ideas, descriptions and plans into coherent, effective visuals. A high score means design ideas come out the way you meant them, in illustrations, icons, diagrams or interface visuals.

Overall score

Overall shows how well a model’s abilities carry over to original, demanding tasks, weighting every benchmark into one score from 0 to 100. Estimated means the total includes an estimate for one missing scene.

Judging

Scores reflect how well each result meets the benchmark requirements. Game scores come from the recorded play: the points earned on each level and how each level ended. How StealthMark keeps scores honest.

Games

Each game is a sequence of levels, and earlier moves carry into later levels. A level that was not played is shown as not played and never counts as zero. Play every level of Latch or Foresight yourself to get a score calculated like the models’.

Reasoning efficiency

Good results with little thinking score high. On each task, a model’s result and reasoning tokens are compared with every other model and combined with the Balanced Integration Score (Liesefeld & Janczyk, 2019); 50 is average. Single step shows how much reasoning a model needs to understand and solve one problem, multi-step how efficiently it keeps working on a task by building on its earlier reasoning, as in agentic workflows. Not part of StealthMark.

BENCHMARK RESULTS

Compare results

This link opens the same results in the same order.

StealthMark benchmark results

Reset benchmark preferences?

Return to the default view, clear comparison selections and restore the advertisement.