STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder

Gemini 4 Argon leads Muse Wonder by 10.4 points on StealthMark, 67.4 to 57.0. It leads on 8 of 9 benchmarks, including Latch, and Muse Wonder on 1, including Foresight. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

67.4/100Overall rank 5/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

63.6/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

74.4/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on StealthMark and is 2× cheaper per output token. Muse Wonder runs 4× faster in our speed test. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Gemini 4 Argon: $102× cheaper$2 inputMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Gemini 4 Argon: 1MTied1M max outputMuse Wonder: 1MTied
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Gemini 4 Argon: 144tokens/sMuse Wonder: 5704× fastertokens/s
Developer
GoogleMeta
Released
13 Oct 202612 Oct 2026
Origin
United StatesBoth
Input → output
Text, image, audio, video, PDF → textText, image, video, audio, PDF → text
Architecture
Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) transformer with native multimodal inputsNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemini 4 Argon ↗Muse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemini 4 Argon 48.6/100Rank 19/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 36 ptsTurn 7 / 20

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelGemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
26 ptsSurvived
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
9 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
6 ptsOut of lives
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Gemini 4 Argon 82.6/100Rank 6/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelGemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
19.2 ptsCleared
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

The central sphere, separate airborne black blob, flattened cyan contact and displaced crimson aftermath support the principal camera and physical-state requirements. Open lateral lanes and initial reflection placements provide partial optical structure, but missing outer chains, sparse nested imagery and incomplete emitter mappings remain substantial limitations. The raised crimson mass also weakens paint-scale fidelity.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder
State at 600 ms24.5/2522.0/25
Camera and placement14.5/1512.0/15
Reflections50.5/12021.5/120
Materials and scale8.5/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An appealing, controlled illustration with a distinctive buoyant silhouette, expressive comic face and rich luminous colour. The full composition and grounded slipper read clearly. The principal limitation is the crowded raised-foot interaction: paws, toes and lining overlap without making the bent leg or tight fit unmistakable.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder
Task & likeness7.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/107.0/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections7.5/107.0/10
Purposeful detail8.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity7.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Gemini 4 Argon

A luminous little dragon struggles with its bedtime slippers while a buoyant tail pulls it upward. The scene tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and the contrast between translucent forms and heavy objects.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

A coherent, moderately complex Mona Lisa reconstruction with substantial portrait volume, articulated clothing and landscape recession. Specific source features support replication beyond recognition alone. Altered facial likeness, uncertain crossed-hand anatomy and pervasive colored crackle keep the result uneven despite its developed shading and detail.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder
Task & likeness6.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.5/105.5/10
Space & placement6.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

A strong decorative beach illustration with controlled color, intricate silhouettes and abundant playful detail. Connected dolphin forms and recognizable equipment support its construction, while the aligned sunset reflection anchors the scene. Compressed wave depth, ambiguous foreground support and uneven reflection specificity limit physical coherence. The saved comparisons support retaining the category assessments.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder
Task & likeness9.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/106.0/10
Space & placement8.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections8.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail9.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character8.0/107.0/10
Materials & effects8.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An accomplished illustration with expressive characters, intricate spray and strong depth. Direct back seating, steering connections and hull-water contact are only partly demonstrated. Clean graphic execution and purposeful detail remain strengths, while shadows and reflections provide limited physical grounding.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder
Task & likeness8.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction8.0/105.5/10
Space & placement7.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections7.5/104.5/10
Purposeful detail8.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character8.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects8.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Gemini 4 Argon

An expressive, detailed illustration with controlled gradients and coherent environmental depth. Continuous body contours and connected bicycle components establish competent construction. Steering grip and pedal engagement remain less explicit than the decorative details and wheel placement. These contact uncertainties limit action and placement credit without establishing broken anatomy.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryGemini 4 ArgonMuse Wonder
Task & likeness9.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction8.5/106.0/10
Space & placement8.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections8.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail8.5/108.5/10
Artistry & character8.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects8.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity8.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.