Gemini 4 Argon 48.6/100Rank 19/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Gemini 4 Argon leads Ling 3.1 Flash by 25.2 points on StealthMark, 67.4 to 42.2. It leads on 8 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Ling 3.1 Flash on 1. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on StealthMark, takes 4× more context and runs 25% faster in our speed test. Ling 3.1 Flash is 11× cheaper per output token.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemini 4 Argon ↗Ling 3.1 Flash ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Gemini 4 Argon
The central sphere, separate airborne black blob, flattened cyan contact and displaced crimson aftermath support the principal camera and physical-state requirements. Open lateral lanes and initial reflection placements provide partial optical structure, but missing outer chains, sparse nested imagery and incomplete emitter mappings remain substantial limitations. The raised crimson mass also weakens paint-scale fidelity.
Ling 3.1 Flash
Central placement, separate airborne black paint and the elongated crimson coating earn substantial state and placement credit. Cyan contact remains unresolved. A few isolated sphere images provide limited optical evidence, while the defining repeated mirror structure is missing. Readable opaque metallic volume and restrained paint scale justify increased material credit. Core: 61.5/170; including the floor reward: 61.5/180.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 24.5/25 | 22.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 14.5/15 | 13.5/15 |
| Reflections | 50.5/120 | 18.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Gemini 4 Argon
An appealing, controlled illustration with a distinctive buoyant silhouette, expressive comic face and rich luminous colour. The full composition and grounded slipper read clearly. The principal limitation is the crowded raised-foot interaction: paws, toes and lining overlap without making the bent leg or tight fit unmistakable.
Ling 3.1 Flash
An appealing, coherent storybook ant with a clear expression, complete silhouette and readable signal mechanism. Clean curves and warm accents support the composition, while simplified joints, schematic hardware, limited material differentiation and modest light interaction constrain its finish.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
Gemini 4 Argon
A luminous little dragon struggles with its bedtime slippers while a buoyant tail pulls it upward. The scene tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and the contrast between translucent forms and heavy objects.
Ling 3.1 Flash
An ant tending signals in a miniature workshop tests insect anatomy, purposeful gestures and the placement of small objects in a lit environment.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Gemini 4 Argon
A coherent, moderately complex Mona Lisa reconstruction with substantial portrait volume, articulated clothing and landscape recession. Specific source features support replication beyond recognition alone. Altered facial likeness, uncertain crossed-hand anatomy and pervasive colored crackle keep the result uneven despite its developed shading and detail.
Ling 3.1 Flash
A basic, uneven Mona Lisa interpretation with a clear facial focal point, articulated eyes and modest tonal volume. Weak likeness, oversized head proportions, unclear shoulders, curled bare arms and indistinct hands limit replication. The compressed composition and rectangular torso weaken an otherwise coherent earthy palette.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 1.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Gemini 4 Argon
A strong decorative beach illustration with controlled color, intricate silhouettes and abundant playful detail. Connected dolphin forms and recognizable equipment support its construction, while the aligned sunset reflection anchors the scene. Compressed wave depth, ambiguous foreground support and uneven reflection specificity limit physical coherence. The saved comparisons support retaining the category assessments.
Ling 3.1 Flash
A coherent sunset illustration with harmonious color, clean silhouettes and readable beach details. Its calm composition works well, while playful activity is modest. Simplified animal anatomy, shallow shoreline layering, repetitive foliage and a geometric reflection limit drawing sophistication and naturalism.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 9.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 9.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Gemini 4 Argon
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Ling 3.1 Flash
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Gemini 4 Argon
An accomplished illustration with expressive characters, intricate spray and strong depth. Direct back seating, steering connections and hull-water contact are only partly demonstrated. Clean graphic execution and purposeful detail remain strengths, while shadows and reflections provide limited physical grounding.
Ling 3.1 Flash
An appealing sunset cartoon with recognizable animals, expressive faces and coherent landscape layers. The sky and warm water streaks provide its strongest rendering. Ambiguous seated support, stiff forelegs, a shallow hull and an unclear steering connection limit construction. Clean shapes and readable accessories add finish, while restrained spray and flat surfaces limit material and motion effects.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 8.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Gemini 4 Argon
An expressive, detailed illustration with controlled gradients and coherent environmental depth. Continuous body contours and connected bicycle components establish competent construction. Steering grip and pedal engagement remain less explicit than the decorative details and wheel placement. These contact uncertainties limit action and placement credit without establishing broken anatomy.
Ling 3.1 Flash
A clean, appealing pelican illustration with a readable bicycle and coherent landscape. Bill shading, feather layers and faint wheel shadows provide modest depth. Uncertain pedal contact, simplified leg construction and limited material rendering keep the result within competent illustration quality.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 9.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 8.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.