Gemini 4 Argon 48.6/100Rank 19/47

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Gemini 4 Argon leads Gemma 4 31B by 41.6 points on StealthMark, 67.4 to 25.8. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on StealthMark, takes 4× more context and runs 24% faster in our speed test. Gemma 4 31B is 25× cheaper per output token.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceGemini 4 Argon ↗Gemma 4 31B ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Gemini 4 Argon
The central sphere, separate airborne black blob, flattened cyan contact and displaced crimson aftermath support the principal camera and physical-state requirements. Open lateral lanes and initial reflection placements provide partial optical structure, but missing outer chains, sparse nested imagery and incomplete emitter mappings remain substantial limitations. The raised crimson mass also weakens paint-scale fidelity.
Gemma 4 31B
The sphere's volume, separate airborne black blob and vertical color ordering are readable. The large, low sphere, plain surrounding planes and absent nested optical imagery leave the central geometric and reflection requirements unsupported. Paint contact and transport remain unresolved. Material credit recognizes the visible convex shading, highlights and distinct surface colors while retaining deductions for the schematic finish and oversized blobs.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 24.5/25 | 11.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 14.5/15 | 3.0/15 |
| Reflections | 50.5/120 | 0.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 8.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Gemini 4 Argon
An appealing, controlled illustration with a distinctive buoyant silhouette, expressive comic face and rich luminous colour. The full composition and grounded slipper read clearly. The principal limitation is the crowded raised-foot interaction: paws, toes and lining overlap without making the bent leg or tight fit unmistakable.
Gemma 4 31B
A clean, appealing luminous mascot with coherent body continuity and a readable jar-hugging pose. Rounded highlights, smooth gradients and balanced framing work well. The teardrop silhouette, modest eyes and nearly even grin only partly satisfy the character brief; sparse jar construction and simple geometry limit sophistication.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
Gemini 4 Argon
A luminous little dragon struggles with its bedtime slippers while a buoyant tail pulls it upward. The scene tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and the contrast between translucent forms and heavy objects.
Gemma 4 31B
A small luminous creature proudly holding an empty glass jar tests expression, transparent materials and the balance of character and prop.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Gemini 4 Argon
A coherent, moderately complex Mona Lisa reconstruction with substantial portrait volume, articulated clothing and landscape recession. Specific source features support replication beyond recognition alone. Altered facial likeness, uncertain crossed-hand anatomy and pervasive colored crackle keep the result uneven despite its developed shading and detail.
Gemma 4 31B
The portrait is recognizable through its silhouette, palette and smile, with clean execution of simple shapes. Replication remains weak: the face and pose differ markedly, hands become fingerless ovals, clothing lacks construction, and the landscape loses its atmospheric detail. Basic gradients provide limited volume.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Gemini 4 Argon
A strong decorative beach illustration with controlled color, intricate silhouettes and abundant playful detail. Connected dolphin forms and recognizable equipment support its construction, while the aligned sunset reflection anchors the scene. Compressed wave depth, ambiguous foreground support and uneven reflection specificity limit physical coherence. The saved comparisons support retaining the category assessments.
Gemma 4 31B
A coherent beach illustration with clean silhouettes, a sweeping shoreline and an effective sunset palette. Requested subjects are recognizable, but primitive animal construction, sparse detail, unsupported palm placement and schematic reflections limit drawing sophistication and physical credibility.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 9.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.5/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 8.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 9.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Gemini 4 Argon
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Gemma 4 31B
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Gemini 4 Argon
An accomplished illustration with expressive characters, intricate spray and strong depth. Direct back seating, steering connections and hull-water contact are only partly demonstrated. Clean graphic execution and purposeful detail remain strengths, while shadows and reflections provide limited physical grounding.
Gemma 4 31B
Clean, simple silhouettes communicate a raccoon riding on a dog. Limited animal specificity, absent steering controls and a flat platform weaken the requested scene. Small facial marks provide purposeful detail, while unresolved support, flat lighting and schematic water restrict physical coherence. Primitive but coherent construction supports basic drawing quality.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 8.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 1.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.5/10 | 2.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Gemini 4 Argon
An expressive, detailed illustration with controlled gradients and coherent environmental depth. Continuous body contours and connected bicycle components establish competent construction. Steering grip and pedal engagement remain less explicit than the decorative details and wheel placement. These contact uncertainties limit action and placement credit without establishing broken anatomy.
Gemma 4 31B
A clean, readable illustration with balanced placement and coherent basic geometry. The sky gradient and ground shadow establish diffuse illumination. Primitive shapes and sparse detail limit artistry, while unclear leg attachment, missing pedal contact and unresolved steering weaken the riding action.
| Category | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 9.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 8.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 8.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 8.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.