Claude Opus 5.5 66.3/100Rank 5/50

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-6.1 Terra by 12.2 points on StealthMark, 72.6 to 60.4. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on StealthMark. GPT-6.1 Terra is 4× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceClaude Opus 5.5 ↗GPT-6.1 Terra ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Claude Opus 5.5
Open lateral sightlines, first reflected silhouettes and near-field planar panel placement are convincing. Missing outer chains, truncated repetitions and absent nested spherical room and emitter imagery remain the main weaknesses.
GPT-6.1 Terra
The sphere, airborne black and first reflected silhouettes preserve important geometry within the portrait frame. Paint deformation, contact order and forward transport are supported, with a small crimson endpoint overshoot. Major optical omissions dominate: short finite reflection sequences and smooth bands replace extensive, spatially ordered mirror imagery. Dark gloss and crisp upper emitter shapes provide partial material credit.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 24.0/25 | 23.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 15.0/15 | 11.0/15 |
| Reflections | 55.0/120 | 33.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 9.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Claude Opus 5.5
The centered coral squid has a friendly, restrained expression and a balanced radial silhouette within a cream arch. Smooth curves and soft shading give it an appealing matte finish. The mantle is more elongated than compact, the upper arms are visually ambiguous, and the two hanging tentacles read somewhat like legs. Clean execution supports a strong stylized illustration.
GPT-6.1 Terra
A balanced serpent emblem with six attached outward heads, delicate scales and softly rounded bodies. Its compact silhouette reads clearly, but central routing does not establish every alternating crossing or crisp inward corner. Repetitive texture, limited facial anatomy and weak contact shadows constrain its organic character.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
Claude Opus 5.5
A coral squid with spreading arms tests connected anatomy, balanced composition and soft surface shading.
GPT-6.1 Terra
A pale serpent woven into an interlocking knot tests connected anatomy, repeated structure and readable overlaps. Organic surface detail must work with the overall geometry.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Claude Opus 5.5
The portrait preserves the recognizable composition, dark veil, folded hands and distant landscape. Replication is limited by the elongated face and neck, conspicuous eyes and simplified smile. Hands remain connected but their rounded fingers and wrists lack convincing anatomy. Restrained colors create cohesion; shallow modeling and pervasive mottling weaken volume and painterly subtlety.
GPT-6.1 Terra
A recognizable interpretation with developed facial shading, shaped sleeve folds and purposeful small features. These strengths support modest upward calibration, while the frontal torso, elongated proportions, schematic finger joints and unresolved seated support keep replication and construction uneven.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Claude Opus 5.5
A lively, well-composed beach illustration with rich sunset colors, recognizable animals and appealing accessories. The sun reflection establishes a strong central focus. Clean silhouettes and small details reward inspection, though simplified animal construction, uneven contact shadows and mostly flat materials limit depth and realism.
GPT-6.1 Terra
A coherent sunset illustration with clear prompt fulfillment, controlled framing and varied, purposeful small details. Simplified joints, frontal staging, flattened animal forms and weakly directional shadows limit its anatomical, spatial and physical sophistication.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Claude Opus 5.5
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
GPT-6.1 Terra
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Claude Opus 5.5
The masked raccoon clearly rides the dog's back, and the dog's forward paw reaches the steering grip. Expressive faces, vivid colors and sweeping wakes create an appealing illustration. Connected limbs remain schematic, as does the small steering assembly. The broad hull and flat foam weaken water contact; the glowing sun lacks a corresponding reflection or convincing cast shadows.
GPT-6.1 Terra
A coherent cartoon with expressive animals, readable steering and a clear wake. Fine facial and hull details reward inspection. The main limits are the boatlike craft, simplified joints, weakly braced frontal raccoon and minimal directional lighting or material depth.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Claude Opus 5.5
The recognizable pelican, orderly bicycle wheels and harmonious sunset create an appealing illustration. Both legs connect to the body and reach pedals; no clear detached or inverted parts appear. Steering contact and seating support are less convincing, while the drivetrain remains schematic. Crisp outlines give a clean finish, but limited shading and flat surfaces leave the scene with modest depth.
GPT-6.1 Terra
A coherent pelican cyclist with expressive proportions, purposeful feather detail and developed bicycle machinery. Continuous body contours, aligned wheels and readable pedal contacts support the scene. Simplified articulation, shallow modelling and an unresolved steering connection limit construction and placement.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.