STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-6.1 Terra by 12.2 points on StealthMark, 72.6 to 60.4. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

72.6/100Overall rank 2/54
60.4/100Overall rank 9/54

General Intelligence

71.3/100
58.0/100

Visual Intelligence

75.0/100
64.9/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • Claude Opus 5.5

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Claude Opus 5.5
  • GPT-6.1 Terra
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on StealthMark. GPT-6.1 Terra is 4× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Claude Opus 5.5
  • GPT-6.1 Terra
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Claude Opus 5.5: $20$4 inputGPT-6.1 Terra: $54× cheaper$1 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Claude Opus 5.5: 1MTied128K max outputGPT-6.1 Terra: 1.05MTied128K max output
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Claude Opus 5.5: 166tokens/sGPT-6.1 Terra: Not measured
Developer
AnthropicOpenAI
Released
22 Sep 202626 Oct 2026
Origin
United StatesBoth
Input → output
Text, image → textBoth

Full datasheets, every price and sourceClaude Opus 5.5 ↗GPT-6.1 Terra ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Claude Opus 5.5 66.3/100Rank 5/50

Survived 3 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

GPT-6.1 Terra 62.0/100Rank 9/50

Survived 2 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 315 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
Level 1Second Thoughts
27 ptsSurvived
21 ptsSurvived
Level 2Pressure Pot
11 ptsSurvived
9 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
9 ptsSurvived
15 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Claude Opus 5.5 87.6/100Rank 1/51

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

GPT-6.1 Terra 77.7/100Rank 12/51

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
10.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
9.8 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
19.2 ptsCleared
19.2 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Claude Opus 5.5

Open lateral sightlines, first reflected silhouettes and near-field planar panel placement are convincing. Missing outer chains, truncated repetitions and absent nested spherical room and emitter imagery remain the main weaknesses.

GPT-6.1 Terra

The sphere, airborne black and first reflected silhouettes preserve important geometry within the portrait frame. Paint deformation, contact order and forward transport are supported, with a small crimson endpoint overshoot. Major optical omissions dominate: short finite reflection sequences and smooth bands replace extensive, spatially ordered mirror imagery. Dark gloss and crisp upper emitter shapes provide partial material credit.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
State at 600 ms24.0/2523.0/25
Camera and placement15.0/1511.0/15
Reflections55.0/12033.0/120
Materials and scale9.0/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Claude Opus 5.5

The centered coral squid has a friendly, restrained expression and a balanced radial silhouette within a cream arch. Smooth curves and soft shading give it an appealing matte finish. The mantle is more elongated than compact, the upper arms are visually ambiguous, and the two hanging tentacles read somewhat like legs. Clean execution supports a strong stylized illustration.

GPT-6.1 Terra

A balanced serpent emblem with six attached outward heads, delicate scales and softly rounded bodies. Its compact silhouette reads clearly, but central routing does not establish every alternating crossing or crisp inward corner. Repetitive texture, limited facial anatomy and weak contact shadows constrain its organic character.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
Task & likeness8.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/106.5/10
Space & placement8.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections7.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail7.0/106.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity8.5/106.0/10

Benchmark task

Claude Opus 5.5

A coral squid with spreading arms tests connected anatomy, balanced composition and soft surface shading.

GPT-6.1 Terra

A pale serpent woven into an interlocking knot tests connected anatomy, repeated structure and readable overlaps. Organic surface detail must work with the overall geometry.

Mona Lisa

Same task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Claude Opus 5.5

The portrait preserves the recognizable composition, dark veil, folded hands and distant landscape. Replication is limited by the elongated face and neck, conspicuous eyes and simplified smile. Hands remain connected but their rounded fingers and wrists lack convincing anatomy. Restrained colors create cohesion; shallow modeling and pervasive mottling weaken volume and painterly subtlety.

GPT-6.1 Terra

A recognizable interpretation with developed facial shading, shaped sleeve folds and purposeful small features. These strengths support modest upward calibration, while the frontal torso, elongated proportions, schematic finger joints and unresolved seated support keep replication and construction uneven.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
Task & likeness6.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/106.5/10
Space & placement6.5/104.5/10
Light & reflections6.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail6.5/106.0/10
Artistry & character6.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Same task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Claude Opus 5.5

A lively, well-composed beach illustration with rich sunset colors, recognizable animals and appealing accessories. The sun reflection establishes a strong central focus. Clean silhouettes and small details reward inspection, though simplified animal construction, uneven contact shadows and mostly flat materials limit depth and realism.

GPT-6.1 Terra

A coherent sunset illustration with clear prompt fulfillment, controlled framing and varied, purposeful small details. Simplified joints, frontal staging, flattened animal forms and weakly directional shadows limit its anatomical, spatial and physical sophistication.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/107.5/10
Space & placement7.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections7.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character8.0/107.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/106.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Claude Opus 5.5

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

GPT-6.1 Terra

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Same task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Claude Opus 5.5

The masked raccoon clearly rides the dog's back, and the dog's forward paw reaches the steering grip. Expressive faces, vivid colors and sweeping wakes create an appealing illustration. Connected limbs remain schematic, as does the small steering assembly. The broad hull and flat foam weaken water contact; the glowing sun lacks a corresponding reflection or convincing cast shadows.

GPT-6.1 Terra

A coherent cartoon with expressive animals, readable steering and a clear wake. Fine facial and hull details reward inspection. The main limits are the boatlike craft, simplified joints, weakly braced frontal raccoon and minimal directional lighting or material depth.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
Task & likeness8.5/106.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.5/105.5/10
Space & placement7.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/105.0/10
Purposeful detail8.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.0/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Same task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Claude Opus 5.5

The recognizable pelican, orderly bicycle wheels and harmonious sunset create an appealing illustration. Both legs connect to the body and reach pedals; no clear detached or inverted parts appear. Steering contact and seating support are less convincing, while the drivetrain remains schematic. Crisp outlines give a clean finish, but limited shading and flat surfaces leave the scene with modest depth.

GPT-6.1 Terra

A coherent pelican cyclist with expressive proportions, purposeful feather detail and developed bicycle machinery. Continuous body contours, aligned wheels and readable pedal contacts support the scene. Simplified articulation, shallow modelling and an unresolved steering connection limit construction and placement.

Score breakdown

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
Task & likeness8.5/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction8.0/107.0/10
Space & placement7.0/106.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail8.0/107.0/10
Artistry & character7.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity8.5/106.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.