Claude Fable 5.1 34.2/100Rank 37/472 of 3 levels

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Claude Fable 5.1 leads Kimi K3.1 Pro by 5.4 points on StealthMark, 62.1 to 56.7. It leads on 6 of 9 benchmarks and Kimi K3.1 Pro on 3, including both games. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on StealthMark. Kimi K3.1 Pro is 5× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceClaude Fable 5.1 ↗Kimi K3.1 Pro ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Claude Fable 5.1
The broad paint sequence, bilateral near-field sphere arrangement, overlaps and diminishing panel repetitions are recognizable; crimson is slightly too low. Small paint scale and basic shading provide material cues, although the steel response remains soft. Inaccurate light projections, missing outer chains and incomplete nested room imagery remain the principal limitations.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The settled sphere, separate airborne black paint and crimson-before-cyan interaction are supported, with a modest crimson travel overshoot. A shared downward framing displacement remains after accounting for the square canvas. The principal limitation is the reflection system: sparse sphere copies and generic curved bands omit most of the ordered mirror-room structure. Materials receive a small upward revision because bounded bright images and dark bands visibly establish some polish, while soft shading and bulky paint remain separate weaknesses.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 24.0/25 | 23.5/25 |
| Camera and placement | 14.0/15 | 10.5/15 |
| Reflections | 48.0/120 | 26.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Claude Fable 5.1
The coral palette, friendly face, matte shading and cream arch create a coherent emblem. However, the mantle is elongated rather than compact, and the appendages spread mostly sideways and downward instead of forming an evenly spaced, flower-like starburst. Two thin hanging appendages weaken the thick-arm motif. Clean contours and balanced framing support the simple design.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The transformed reflection, attentive pose and constellation anatomy clearly communicate introspection. Purposeful fine details enrich a coherent composition. Tubular limbs, crowded lower-body overlaps, shallow depth and limited cast lighting keep the overall execution within the competent range.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 6.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
Claude Fable 5.1
A coral squid with spreading arms tests connected anatomy, balanced composition and soft surface shading.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
An imagined creature encounters its reflection. The scene tests original character design, visual self-interpretation and the relationship between a subject and its reflected image.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Claude Fable 5.1
The dark clothing, crossed hands and hazy landscape establish the Mona Lisa composition. Replication is limited by the frontal, elongated face, wide eyes and simplified smile. Rounded, parallel fingers and unclear wrist transitions weaken the hands. Warm facial shading gives some volume, but broad garment shapes and scattered crack marks substitute for convincing folds and painterly detail.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
A coherent, recognizable interpretation with controlled color and readable landscape layers. Replication is limited by the frontal seated construction, elongated facial proportions and oversized, weakly articulated hands. Smooth shading supplies some volume but little of the reference's subtle expression, fabric structure or atmospheric transitions.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Claude Fable 5.1
The colorful sunset, layered shoreline, animals, kite and beach toys fulfill the lively beach brief. Clean silhouettes and a balanced composition give the illustration character. Construction is simplified: the umbrella resembles a segmented fan, dolphins have weak water interaction, and the sun’s reflection forms a rigid widening wedge. Flat surfaces and sparse contact shadows limit depth.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
A coherent, playful beach illustration with readable animals, an organized composition and an aligned sunset reflection. Connected silhouettes, sand texture and atmospheric effects demonstrate controlled execution. Simplified joints, flattened foreground viewpoints and inconsistent shadows limit anatomical and spatial credibility.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Claude Fable 5.1
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Claude Fable 5.1
The raccoon rides on the dog's back, and the dog's extended foreleg reaches the jet ski controls. Expressive faces, a clear silhouette and sweeping spray make the action readable. Limb and handlebar overlaps weaken construction; broad shading provides limited volume, and the glowing sun has little corresponding reflection on the water. Clean vector shapes support an appealing but simplified illustration.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The additional comparisons support retaining the assessment. Readable steering, shaped animal contours and purposeful details coexist with simplified joints, a frontal passenger whose seated weight is weakly conveyed, and limited physical lighting. The angled craft establishes more depth than the riding pose resolves.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Claude Fable 5.1
The pelican reads clearly, with an expressive face, prominent bill and appealing composition. Both legs connect to the body, but the far foot's pedal contact and the wing's steering grip remain unclear. Wheel alignment and background layers are coherent. Clean contours and feather lines give polish, while schematic machinery, limited surface texture and weak directional lighting constrain the finish.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
A characterful coastal illustration with controlled contours and varied feather, accessory and bicycle detail. Layered scenery and subtle shading enrich the presentation. Soft leg articulation, unresolved riding contacts, shallow depth and generalized lighting limit physical precision.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.