STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Cat Jam Free vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Cat Jam Free by 23.5 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 33.5. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

33.5/100Overall rank 40/53
57.0/100Overall rank 10/53

General Intelligence

27.7/100
53.1/100

Visual Intelligence

43.0/100
64.0/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

NeitherApache-2.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Cat Jam Free
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

  • Cat Jam Free
  • Muse Wonder
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Cat Jam Free: No list priceMuse Wonder: $20$4 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Cat Jam Free: Not publishedMuse Wonder: 1M
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Cat Jam Free: Not measuredMuse Wonder: 570tokens/s
Developer
Not publishedMeta
Released
Not published12 Oct 2026
Origin
Not publishedUnited States
Input → output
Not publishedText, image, video, audio, PDF → text

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Cat Jam Free 33.8/100Rank 26/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Points per level

LevelCat Jam FreeMuse Wonder
Level 1Second Thoughts
5 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
6 ptsOut of lives
10 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
9 ptsSurvived
11 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Cat Jam Free 33.9/100Rank 33/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 56 ptsTurn 25 / 40

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelCat Jam FreeMuse Wonder
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
10 ptsFinished early
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
10.8 ptsFinished early
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
Level 5Second thoughts
6 ptsFinished early
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The image conveys a supported central sphere, separate black paint and crimson below cyan. Its contact and transport story is partially resolved. The exterior cutaway camera and largely missing mirror system dominate the limitations; isolated discs and smooth highlights provide little coherent optical structure.

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMuse Wonder
State at 600 ms14.0/2522.0/25
Camera and placement4.0/1512.0/15
Reflections3.5/12021.5/120
Materials and scale4.0/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

A coherent, restrained cat illustration captures the pale palette and intent eyes. Its central expressive requirement—the committed forward-and-down neck bob—is insufficiently articulated. Simple geometry, faint paw construction and minimal surface detail limit the physical presence and finish.

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMuse Wonder
Task & likeness5.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/107.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Cat Jam Free

An ivory cat nods intently to music beside a tiny speaker. The scene tests feline anatomy, movement conveyed through a still pose and the contrast between pale fur and woven fabric.

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The portrait is recognizable and cleanly assembled, but replication remains basic. Its frontal symmetry, elongated silhouette, simplified facial likeness and unresolved hands differ markedly from the original. Modest skin gradients provide volume, while clothing and landscape rely on broad, flat shapes.

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMuse Wonder
Task & likeness2.5/105.5/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/105.5/10
Space & placement4.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections3.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/105.5/10
Artistry & character3.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects2.5/105.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/106.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The scene clearly supplies the requested beach subjects and playful activity. Clean silhouettes and warm gradients support readability, but elementary drawing, ambiguous parasol construction, weak grounding and a rigid sun reflection limit its depth and finish.

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMuse Wonder
Task & likeness7.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/106.0/10
Space & placement4.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections4.0/106.5/10
Purposeful detail4.0/109.0/10
Artistry & character4.5/107.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity5.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

An appealing cartoon demonstrates the back-riding arrangement through expressive faces and clean shapes. Uncertain steering contact, indistinct deck support and weak hull-water interaction limit physical coherence. Smooth gradients add volume, but simple rounded construction and sparse material detail constrain complexity and finish.

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMuse Wonder
Task & likeness6.0/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/105.5/10
Space & placement5.0/106.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/107.5/10
Artistry & character5.0/105.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity4.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

A coherent cartoon with readable bicycle placement, controlled outlines and modest surface shading. The separated-looking upper bill weakens pelican likeness; schematic limbs, uncertain gripping contact and simplified mechanics constrain construction. Opaque wheel interiors flatten spatial relationships. Limited feather complexity and directional lighting keep the finish modest.

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMuse Wonder
Task & likeness7.0/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/106.0/10
Space & placement6.0/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/105.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/108.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/106.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.