STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Cat Jam Free vs MAI-Thinking-1

Cat Jam Free leads MAI-Thinking-1 by 19.4 points on StealthMark, 33.5 to 14.1. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Cat Jam Free scores higher on Ground Truth.

See the difference ↘
Model guide ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

33.5/100Overall rank 40/53
14.1/100Overall rank 51/53

General Intelligence

27.7/100
7.4/100

Visual Intelligence

43.0/100
24.6/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • MAI-Thinking-1Single-step reasoning not measured

Open or local

NeitherApache-2.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Cat Jam Free
  • MAI-Thinking-1
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

  • Cat Jam Free
  • MAI-Thinking-1
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Cat Jam Free: No list priceMAI-Thinking-1: $8$2 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Cat Jam Free: Not publishedMAI-Thinking-1: 256K64K max outputEstimated
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Cat Jam Free: Not measuredMAI-Thinking-1: 93tokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Cat Jam Free: Not disclosedMAI-Thinking-1: 1T35B activeEstimated
Developer
Not publishedMicrosoft AI
Released
Not published12 Aug 2026
Origin
Not publishedUnited States
Input → output
Not publishedText → text
Architecture
Not publishedSparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMAI-Thinking-1 ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Cat Jam Free 33.8/100Rank 26/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 39 ptsTurn 20 / 20

MAI-Thinking-1 6.4/100Rank 44/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 31 ptsTurn 8 / 20

Points per level

LevelCat Jam FreeMAI-Thinking-1
Level 1Second Thoughts
5 ptsOut of lives
3 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
6 ptsOut of lives
3 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
9 ptsSurvived
1 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Cat Jam Free 33.9/100Rank 33/48

Cleared 2 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 56 ptsTurn 25 / 40

MAI-Thinking-1 3.6/100Rank 44/48

Cleared 1 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 511.8 ptsTurn 16 / 40

Points per level

LevelCat Jam FreeMAI-Thinking-1
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9.8 ptsCleared
2 ptsOut of turns
Level 3Relay vault
10 ptsFinished early
2.2 ptsFinished early
Level 4Passing bay
10.8 ptsFinished early
3 ptsFinished early
Level 5Second thoughts
6 ptsFinished early
11.8 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The image conveys a supported central sphere, separate black paint and crimson below cyan. Its contact and transport story is partially resolved. The exterior cutaway camera and largely missing mirror system dominate the limitations; isolated discs and smooth highlights provide little coherent optical structure.

MAI-Thinking-1

The small paint features and convex shading deserve moderate material credit. The sphere remains undersized and low, with black unusually close to its apex. Crimson and cyan do not establish the required impact histories. Faint reflected echoes supply limited optical evidence, while the defining recursive room, nested sphere and emitter structures remain unestablished.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMAI-Thinking-1
State at 600 ms14.0/253.0/25
Camera and placement4.0/152.5/15
Reflections3.5/1204.0/120
Materials and scale4.0/102.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

A coherent, restrained cat illustration captures the pale palette and intent eyes. Its central expressive requirement—the committed forward-and-down neck bob—is insufficiently articulated. Simple geometry, faint paw construction and minimal surface detail limit the physical presence and finish.

MAI-Thinking-1

A recognizable lantern-and-moth illustration with appealing coloured wings and tidy outer contours. Simple construction, a small focal subject and crowded overlaps limit character and depth. The face, six-leg anatomy, seedling and antenna-driven watering joke remain insufficiently readable.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMAI-Thinking-1
Task & likeness5.5/104.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/104.5/10
Space & placement6.0/105.0/10
Light & reflections6.0/104.5/10
Purposeful detail4.0/104.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/105.0/10
Visual integrity6.5/106.0/10

Benchmark task

Cat Jam Free

An ivory cat nods intently to music beside a tiny speaker. The scene tests feline anatomy, movement conveyed through a still pose and the contrast between pale fur and woven fabric.

MAI-Thinking-1

A fluffy moth tends a lantern greenhouse amid a gardening mishap. The scene tests insect anatomy, expressive action, translucent wings and the interaction of light with small objects.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The portrait is recognizable and cleanly assembled, but replication remains basic. Its frontal symmetry, elongated silhouette, simplified facial likeness and unresolved hands differ markedly from the original. Modest skin gradients provide volume, while clothing and landscape rely on broad, flat shapes.

MAI-Thinking-1

A recognizable Mona Lisa motif emerges from dark hair, a pale face and a landscape band. Replication remains weak: the oversized frontal head, broad smile, unresolved torso and missing crossed-hand anatomy diverge substantially from the reference. Simple fills and sparse strokes provide limited volume, material definition or painterly complexity.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMAI-Thinking-1
Task & likeness2.5/101.0/10
Anatomy & construction2.0/100.5/10
Space & placement4.0/101.0/10
Light & reflections3.5/101.5/10
Purposeful detail3.0/101.0/10
Artistry & character3.0/101.5/10
Materials & effects2.5/100.5/10
Visual integrity5.5/103.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

The scene clearly supplies the requested beach subjects and playful activity. Clean silhouettes and warm gradients support readability, but elementary drawing, ambiguous parasol construction, weak grounding and a rigid sun reflection limit its depth and finish.

MAI-Thinking-1

A coherent, cheerful beach scene with balanced placement, clean shapes and controlled sunset colours. Animals, birds and playful accessories are recognizable, but basic dolphin construction, weak grounding, schematic reflections and sparse material detail limit the drawing's accomplishment.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMAI-Thinking-1
Task & likeness7.0/106.0/10
Anatomy & construction4.5/104.0/10
Space & placement4.5/105.0/10
Light & reflections4.0/104.0/10
Purposeful detail4.0/104.5/10
Artistry & character4.5/104.0/10
Materials & effects4.5/103.5/10
Visual integrity5.5/104.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MAI-Thinking-1

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

An appealing cartoon demonstrates the back-riding arrangement through expressive faces and clean shapes. Uncertain steering contact, indistinct deck support and weak hull-water interaction limit physical coherence. Smooth gradients add volume, but simple rounded construction and sparse material detail constrain complexity and finish.

MAI-Thinking-1

The recognizable raccoon and clean, shaded forms make a readable cartoon. The dog's steering remains undemonstrated, while ambiguous seating contacts and a minimally constructed craft weaken the central interaction. Controlled gradients and edges deserve credit, but anatomy, purposeful detail and water displacement remain basic.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMAI-Thinking-1
Task & likeness6.0/103.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/102.0/10
Space & placement5.0/105.0/10
Light & reflections5.0/103.5/10
Purposeful detail6.0/103.0/10
Artistry & character5.0/102.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/103.5/10
Visual integrity4.5/105.5/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Cat Jam Free

A coherent cartoon with readable bicycle placement, controlled outlines and modest surface shading. The separated-looking upper bill weakens pelican likeness; schematic limbs, uncertain gripping contact and simplified mechanics constrain construction. Opaque wheel interiors flatten spatial relationships. Limited feather complexity and directional lighting keep the finish modest.

MAI-Thinking-1

A recognizable pelican and bicycle combine clean rounded forms, expressive facial details and effective surface shading. Aligned wheels and soft shadows establish placement, but unresolved pedal engagement, absent steering contact and sparse drivetrain construction weaken the riding action. Limited feather complexity and shallow space constrain an otherwise appealing illustration.

Score breakdown

CategoryCat Jam FreeMAI-Thinking-1
Task & likeness7.0/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.0/104.5/10
Space & placement6.0/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/105.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/104.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.