Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Central object placement is fairly close, but the defining mirrored-room structure is missing. The paint colors suggest the required contact order without establishing their different interaction histories. The faint floor oval does not demonstrate valid reflection geometry, so it earns no reflection credit. Rounded volume and glossy paint provide limited material credit despite weak metallic finishes and oversized paint bodies.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Separate airborne black and contact-compatible paint flattening earn partial state credit. Settlement, adhesion and differentiated paint transport remain unresolved. The enlarged, low sphere and thin lamp strip substantially depart from the required camera, while the defining mirror structure is missing. Weak material appearance and oversized black paint limit material credit. The retained base total is 18/170; the floor-damage reward is 0, giving 18/180.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

An appealing expression and warm palette support a coherent simple cartoon. The central polishing joke is not legible: the cloth is unresolved and the nose sits away from the fan. Pointed radial plates, uncertain limb attachments and weak ground contact limit construction, while restrained surface detail limits material richness.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

An appealing, readable sparkle-creature with luminous colour and expressive eyes. Simple geometric construction limits sophistication, while sharp body points, ambiguous hand contact and a minimally resolved jar weaken the requested soft, plump character and treasure-presenting pose.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

A golden pangolin polishes its oversized amber tail while its nose smudges the same scale. The scene tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting translucent, polished and soft materials.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A small luminous creature proudly holding an empty glass jar tests expression, transparent materials and the balance of character and prop.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

The candidate shows a faint warm oval against an almost entirely black field. Minimal placement and smooth tonal variation are visible, but the portrait, anatomy, crossed hands and landscape remain unreadable. The saved comparisons provide no specific evidence supporting a change to the baseline categories.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

The centered dark-haired portrait provides a loose reference cue, but its elongated, nearly featureless face and undifferentiated torso fall far short of replication. Crossed hands, the subtle smile, clothing structure and landscape are unresolved. Clean silhouettes and soft gradients provide limited coherence.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

A coherent, cheerful beach illustration fulfills the main subjects with clean shapes and a strong sunset focal point. Its basic geometric construction, ambiguous animal anatomy, shallow depth and schematic lighting limit its accomplishment. Decorative details provide interest without developing intricate forms or convincing physical surfaces.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A clean, balanced sunset scene demonstrates the beach, birds and a centered reflection. Animals and play receive only minimal treatment. Coherent layers and controlled gradients support readability, but unresolved aquatic anatomy, sparse details and weak surface modeling keep the drawing basic.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

A cheerful, readable illustration with recognizable animals, expressive faces and useful accessories. Simple rounded construction limits complexity, while ambiguous steering attachments and weak hull-to-water contact reduce physical coherence. Lighting and surface effects establish the setting without convincing environmental interaction.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

The animal stack is recognizable, and clean silhouettes support a basic illustration. Steering is not depicted, while the craft's construction and water contact remain unresolved. Sparse anatomical and material detail limit the finish. The sky gradient and glow provide atmospheric lighting, but the subjects lack corresponding modeling.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B

A cheerful, clearly readable pelican-and-bicycle illustration with clean contours and balanced composition. Simple geometric construction limits artistic complexity, while ambiguous neck and steering overlaps, merged pedal contacts and an incomplete drivetrain weaken physical coherence.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

A clean, balanced icon suggests a pelican riding a bicycle. Continuous contours and restrained colors support its finish, but the abbreviated bill, undifferentiated body, unresolved riding contacts and incomplete bicycle mechanism limit likeness and construction. Sparse detail and flat lighting keep the drawing basic despite its clarity.