Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/49

STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD
All comparisons ↗Muse Wonder leads Step 5 Preview by 18.0 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 39.0. It leads on all 9 benchmarks. Muse Wonder scores higher on Ground Truth.
See the difference ↘On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.
BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK
DATASHEET
Both take about 1M tokens of context.
Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗Step 5 Preview ↗
Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.


Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗


Muse Wonder
The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.
Step 5 Preview
The main sphere, airborne black and small colored features occupy broadly appropriate positions. Most of the defining mirror system is absent, and paint interaction remains only partially supported. The small paint features do not visibly establish a separate volume-scale violation.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| State at 600 ms | 22.0/25 | 20.0/25 |
| Camera and placement | 12.0/15 | 13.5/15 |
| Reflections | 21.5/120 | 20.0/120 |
| Materials and scale | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Floor-damage reward | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.
Visual construction and creative interpretation.


Muse Wonder
An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.
Step 5 Preview
A charming diagonal climber and warm palette communicate the central idea. Simple rounded construction, crowded limb counting, uncertain footholds and an unattached upper shelf limit its physical coherence. Growth bands and the yarn trail add specificity, but the requested material distinctions and unravelled bootie remain underdeveloped.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 7.0/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 7.0/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Artistry & character | 6.5/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
Muse Wonder
A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.
Step 5 Preview
Character scenes test expression, anatomy, materials and coherent visual construction.
Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.


Muse Wonder
A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.
Step 5 Preview
A recognizable, coherent simplification with purposeful facial contours and differentiated fingers. These provide more construction and detail than the broad silhouette alone suggests. The oversized face, frontal seated pose, unresolved wrists and sparse landscape still substantially limit likeness, depth and finish.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 5.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 6.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.
Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.


Muse Wonder
A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.
Step 5 Preview
A recognizable sunset beach with clear warm-cool contrast and playful accessories. Basic animal construction, shallow foreground placement and schematic reflections limit spatial and physical credibility. Sparse descriptive detail and abruptly ended sky bands constrain the finish.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Light & reflections | 6.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 9.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.
Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.


Muse Wonder
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
Step 5 Preview
This benchmark has not been assessed yet.
A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.
Scene composition and interacting subjects.


Muse Wonder
An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.
Step 5 Preview
Recognizable animals, a bright palette and identifying accessories support a basic cartoon. Primitive anatomy, partial seated support, unresolved steering and weak hull-water contact limit the central action. Lighting and spray provide atmosphere without establishing convincing physical depth.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 7.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 5.5/10 | 4.5/10 |
| Space & placement | 6.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 4.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 7.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 5.5/10 | 3.5/10 |
| Materials & effects | 7.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 7.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.
Subject construction and spatial relationships.


Muse Wonder
A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.
Step 5 Preview
The pelican and bicycle are recognizable, with a pleasant palette and basic diffuse shading. The riding relationship fails physically: the bird is unsupported, the front wheel is unmounted, and pedalling is unresolved. Simple geometric construction and sparse material treatment further limit the drawing.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Task & likeness | 8.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Anatomy & construction | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Space & placement | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Light & reflections | 5.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Purposeful detail | 8.5/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Artistry & character | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Materials & effects | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Visual integrity | 8.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.