STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Muse Wonder vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

Muse Wonder leads MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) by 11.5 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 45.5. It leads on 7 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) on 2. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in state at 600 ms.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
Model guide ↗

Overall StealthMark

57.0/100Overall rank 10/53
45.5/100Overall rank 26/53

General Intelligence

53.1/100
35.7/100

Visual Intelligence

64.0/100
64.4/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Muse Wonder
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 1.9× faster in our speed test.

  • Muse Wonder
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Muse Wonder: $20$4 inputMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version): No list price
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Muse Wonder: 1MMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version): Not published
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Muse Wonder: 5701.9× fastertokens/sMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version): 300tokens/s
Developer
MetaNot published
Released
12 Oct 2026Not published
Origin
United StatesNot published
Input → output
Text, image, video, audio, PDF → textNot published

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) 35.8/100Rank 24/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 38 ptsTurn 19 / 20

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
Level 1Second Thoughts
16 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsOut of lives
Level 2Pressure Pot
10 ptsOut of lives
6 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
11 ptsOut of lives
8 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) 34.4/100Rank 32/48

Cleared 3 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 512.6 ptsTurn 17 / 40

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9 ptsCleared
9 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
18.8 ptsCleared
16.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
Level 4Passing bay
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
10.4 ptsFinished early
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
12.6 ptsFinished early

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) 24.9/100 Rank 33/53

Space Bunny Alpha: Newton's Mirror SVG benchmark
29 Sep onwardResult details ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

Visible panel shapes, curved sphere highlights, rounded side images and a lower continuation beneath the large left image establish recognizable local mirror structure. Their uneven arrangement, missing receding chains and absent nested imagery remain substantial shortcomings. The main sphere's framing is close, but black lacks projected separation and cyan does not establish recent apex contact.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
State at 600 ms22.0/2511.0/25
Camera and placement12.0/159.0/15
Reflections21.5/12015.5/120
Materials and scale7.5/107.5/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) 78.9/100 Rank 3/53

Space Bunny Alpha: Selfie SVG benchmark
29 Sep onwardResult details ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

The expressive rabbits, lavender moon and diagonal ring create an appealing storybook composition with nearly all requested features. Glossy eyes and pearly highlights work well. The helmet leaves the towering ears unenclosed, the reaching arm has little joint definition, and the spread boots suggest hovering more clearly than pushing off. Repeated scalloped fur marks and broad gradients limit material depth; purple edge halos soften otherwise controlled silhouettes.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
Task & likeness7.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/107.5/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections7.0/108.0/10
Purposeful detail7.5/108.0/10
Artistry & character6.5/108.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/107.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

An astronaut rabbit reaches for a carrot above a small moon while a younger companion peeks into view. The scene tests expressive characters, spatial relationships and material detail.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) 49.9/100 Rank 13/53

Space Bunny Alpha: Mona Lisa SVG benchmark
29 Sep onwardResult details ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

The dark clothing, folded hands and muted landscape make the reference recognizable. Replication is limited by the broad frontal face, oversized head, explicit smile and simplified landscape. Arms connect coherently, but overlapping hands lack convincing finger construction. Soft gradients suggest volume and atmospheric depth; clothing folds and facial features remain schematic.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
Task & likeness5.5/104.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/105.0/10
Space & placement5.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/104.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/104.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/105.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) 67.8/100 Rank 20/53

Space Bunny Alpha: Beach SVG benchmark
29 Sep onwardResult details ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

A cheerful, coherent beach illustration with a strong sunset focal point, varied animals and readable small accessories. Connected flamingo legs and grounded foreground objects support the scene. Construction remains schematic, especially the airborne marine animal; its jump lacks clear water displacement. The sun reflection is effective but geometrically rigid, while shadows and material textures provide limited depth.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/106.0/10
Space & placement6.5/106.0/10
Light & reflections6.5/107.0/10
Purposeful detail9.0/106.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/106.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) 42.7/100 Rank 22/53

Space Bunny Alpha: Ground Truth SVG benchmark
29 Sep onwardResult details ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

The raccoon clearly rides on the dog's back, and the dog's paws reach a connected steering assembly. Expressive faces, controlled outlines and layered mountains make an appealing illustration. The seated anatomy and hull geometry are simplified, while the sunset has little corresponding reflection or directional shading. Curved spray conveys motion, although several splash ribbons look decorative.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
Task & likeness7.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/107.5/10
Space & placement6.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections4.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/107.0/10
Materials & effects7.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/108.5/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version) 68.0/100 Rank 21/53

Space Bunny Alpha: Pelican SVG benchmark
29 Sep onwardResult details ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)

The large pouched bill clearly identifies the pelican, and the balanced bicycle silhouette makes the action readable. Attached legs reach the crank area, but overlapping feet and crank lines leave pedal contact ambiguous. Consistent wheel scale, clean contours and a restrained coastal palette support an appealing composition. Lighting and surface treatment remain simple and mostly flat.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderMiniMax M3.1 Flash (early version)
Task & likeness8.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/106.5/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail8.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character7.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.