STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.8-Max-0902

Qwen3.8-Max-0902 leads Muse Wonder by 6.3 points on StealthMark, 63.3 to 57.0. It leads on 6 of 9 benchmarks, including both games, and Muse Wonder on 3. Qwen3.8-Max-0902 scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

57.0/100Overall rank 10/53
63.3/100Overall rank 6/53

General Intelligence

53.1/100
62.7/100

Visual Intelligence

64.0/100
64.5/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Muse Wonder
  • Qwen3.8-Max-0902
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Muse Wonder runs 7.5× faster in our speed test. Qwen3.8-Max-0902 scores higher on StealthMark and is 4× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Muse Wonder
  • Qwen3.8-Max-0902
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Muse Wonder: $20$4 inputQwen3.8-Max-0902: $4.954× cheaper$1.65 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Muse Wonder: 1MTiedQwen3.8-Max-0902: 1MTied128K max output
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Muse Wonder: 5707.5× fastertokens/sQwen3.8-Max-0902: 76tokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Muse Wonder: Not disclosedQwen3.8-Max-0902: 2.4T95B activeEstimated
Developer
MetaQwen / Alibaba Cloud
Released
12 Oct 20262 Sep 2026
Origin
United StatesChina
Input → output
Text, image, video, audio, PDF → textText, image → text
Architecture
Not publishedMixture-of-Experts; hosted version based on the open Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗Qwen3.8-Max-0902 ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Qwen3.8-Max-0902 72.4/100Rank 4/47

Survived 2 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 316 ptsTurn 20 / 20

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderQwen3.8-Max-0902
Level 1Second Thoughts
16 ptsOut of lives
27 ptsSurvived
Level 2Pressure Pot
10 ptsOut of lives
12 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
11 ptsOut of lives
16 ptsSurvived

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Qwen3.8-Max-0902 82.6/100Rank 6/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderQwen3.8-Max-0902
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9 ptsCleared
9.8 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
18.8 ptsCleared
19.2 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
18.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
20.6 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Qwen3.8-Max-0902

The central sphere and differentiated cyan/crimson interaction are supported. The tiny highlighted object above the sphere provides partial airborne-black evidence. The few isolated sphere and panel images preserve limited optical relationships, but most of the repeating mirror-room structure is missing. Core score: 64.5/170; including the floor-damage reward: 64.5/180.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Max-0902
State at 600 ms22.0/2523.0/25
Camera and placement12.0/1512.0/15
Reflections21.5/12029.0/120
Materials and scale7.5/108.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Qwen3.8-Max-0902

A coherent ornamental illustration with balanced framing, appealing color and legible magical accessories. The disconnected raised wrist, incorrect raised-arm side and palm orientation, bear-like facial proportions and shallow material modeling limit execution. Clean decoration and compact spatial balance remain strengths.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Max-0902
Task & likeness7.5/107.5/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/106.5/10
Space & placement7.5/108.0/10
Light & reflections7.0/107.0/10
Purposeful detail7.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character6.5/107.0/10
Materials & effects6.5/107.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/106.5/10

Benchmark task

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Qwen3.8-Max-0902

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Qwen3.8-Max-0902

A recognizable, cohesive Mona Lisa interpretation with readable landscape layers and a restrained expression. Continuous body construction and clean contours support readability, but broad hands, simplified drapery, frontal symmetry and limited facial volume keep the execution basic and uneven.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Max-0902
Task & likeness5.5/104.5/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/103.5/10
Space & placement5.5/105.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/105.0/10
Purposeful detail5.5/105.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.0/10
Materials & effects5.0/103.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/105.0/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Qwen3.8-Max-0902

A strong stylized beach illustration with coherent sunset color, lively dolphin arcs and balanced activity. Clean contours, readable ground contact and an aligned reflection support the finish. Schematic anatomy, sparse small-subject features, flat materials and repetitive water highlights limit physical depth and refinement.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Max-0902
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/107.5/10
Space & placement6.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections6.5/108.0/10
Purposeful detail9.0/107.0/10
Artistry & character7.0/108.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/108.5/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Qwen3.8-Max-0902

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Qwen3.8-Max-0902

The riding arrangement and steering action are readable, supported by coherent visible attachments and useful character details. Clean shapes, strong color separation and clustered foam make the scene appealing and active. Stiff anatomy, crowded controls, limited directional lighting and simple surface treatments constrain sophistication.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Max-0902
Task & likeness7.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/107.0/10
Space & placement6.5/107.0/10
Light & reflections4.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Qwen3.8-Max-0902

An appealing graphic illustration with a recognizable pelican, readable bicycle and clean coastal composition. Steering contact and one connected pedal support the action. Ambiguous neck-to-torso construction, an unclear opposing pedal connection, shallow space and limited material and lighting effects constrain its execution.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Max-0902
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/106.5/10
Space & placement7.5/107.0/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.0/10
Purposeful detail8.5/107.5/10
Artistry & character7.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.0/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.