STEALTHMARK · HEAD TO HEAD

All comparisons ↗

Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.8-Flash

Muse Wonder leads Qwen3.8-Flash by 10.4 points on StealthMark, 57.0 to 46.6. Qwen3.8-Flash leads on 5 of 9 benchmarks, including Latch, and Muse Wonder on 4, including Foresight. Muse Wonder scores higher on Newton's Mirror, with its largest category advantage in reflections.

See the difference ↘
All results ↗
All results ↗

Overall StealthMark

57.0/100Overall rank 10/53
46.6/100Overall rank 23/53

General Intelligence

53.1/100
38.5/100

Visual Intelligence

64.0/100
60.3/100

Reasoning efficiency

On every task, result quality and reasoning tokens are each compared with all measured models and weighed equally. Each dot is one model.

Single-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens on a single problem

Multi-step reasoning Result quality weighed against reasoning tokens across connected steps, as in agentic workflows

Open or local

Local modelOpen model · Qwen Community 1.0

BENCHMARK BY BENCHMARK

Where each model leads

  • Muse Wonder
  • Qwen3.8-Flash
  • Other models
  • Median

DATASHEET

Specs and pricing

Muse Wonder scores higher on StealthMark and runs 7.6× faster in our speed test. Qwen3.8-Flash is 52× cheaper per output token. Both take about 1M tokens of context.

  • Muse Wonder
  • Qwen3.8-Flash
  • Other models
  • Median
PricePer 1M output tokens, input below
Muse Wonder: $20$4 inputQwen3.8-Flash: $0.3852× cheaper$0.11 input
Context windowTokens per request, max output below
Muse Wonder: 1MTiedQwen3.8-Flash: 1MTied128K max output
Output speedTokens per second, our measurement
Muse Wonder: 5707.6× fastertokens/sQwen3.8-Flash: 75tokens/s
SizeTotal and active parameters
Muse Wonder: Not disclosedQwen3.8-Flash: 180B6B activeEstimated
Developer
MetaQwen / Alibaba Cloud
Released
12 Oct 202626 Aug 2026
Origin
United StatesChina
Input → output
Text, image, video, audio, PDF → textText, image, video → text
Architecture
Not publishedHosted Flash based on Flash-Next: sparse attention and n-gram memory; Flash-Next previews Qwen 4 architecture

Full datasheets, every price and sourceMuse Wonder ↗Qwen3.8-Flash ↗

Anticipating threats and planning ahead. Collect coins while avoiding ghosts. Ghosts move before the player each turn, and collisions cost a life. 3 levels in sequence, up to 66 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 52.3/100Rank 17/47

Survived 0 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 311 ptsTurn 17 / 20

Qwen3.8-Flash 29.7/100Rank 33/47

Survived 1 of 3
Foresight: complete playing field
Level 35 ptsTurn 10 / 20

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderQwen3.8-Flash
Level 1Second Thoughts
16 ptsOut of lives
26 ptsSurvived
Level 2Pressure Pot
10 ptsOut of lives
3 ptsOut of lives
Level 3Hide or Flight
11 ptsOut of lives
5 ptsOut of lives

Cooperative planning and learning from experience. Coordinate two robots to push numbered cores onto matching sockets. Pressure plates hold doors open; moving either robot uses one turn. 5 levels in sequence, up to 152 turns in total. Earlier moves and outcomes carry forward, testing learning across levels.

Muse Wonder 67.0/100Rank 17/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520.6 ptsTurn 27 / 40

Qwen3.8-Flash 69.8/100Rank 16/48

Cleared 5 of 5
Latch: complete playing field
Level 520 ptsTurn 30 / 40

Points per level

LevelMuse WonderQwen3.8-Flash
Level 1Hold the door
5.2 ptsCleared
5.2 ptsCleared
Level 2Crossfeed
9 ptsCleared
9.8 ptsCleared
Level 3Relay vault
18.8 ptsCleared
18.8 ptsCleared
Level 4Passing bay
17.8 ptsClearedFinished early · 1 beacon left
17.2 ptsClearedFinished early · 3 beacons left
Level 5Second thoughts
20.6 ptsCleared
20 ptsCleared

Newton's Mirror

Same task instructions

Physics, perspective and recursive reflections, tested together. Explore the test ↗

The judgment

Muse Wonder

The flattened cyan cap, separate airborne black blob and crimson droplets support much of the contact sequence, although crimson adhesion and forward carriage remain unresolved. Main-sphere placement is broadly compatible with the prescribed view. Sparse isolated mirror images replace the defining repeated room structure and curved nested reflections. The crimson mass is visibly oversized, and the top-center lamp image is missing.

Qwen3.8-Flash

The full-frame illustration supports a central steel sphere, an airborne black blob and the relative ordering of cyan and crimson. Its faint floor return and symmetric repetitions provide sparse mirror structure; outer chains, large reflected images, nested imagery and emitter mapping remain deficient. Vertical framing is substantially displaced, and paint contact histories remain unresolved.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Flash
State at 600 ms22.0/2519.0/25
Camera and placement12.0/153.5/15
Reflections21.5/1209.5/120
Materials and scale7.5/104.0/10
Floor-damage reward0.0/100.0/10

Benchmark task

A spinning metal sphere and paint in a mirrored room test physical reasoning, perspective and consistency across repeated reflections.

Selfie

Different task instructions

Visual construction and creative interpretation.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An appealing, coherent cartoon with a readable effortful expression and clear forefeet gripping the trunk. Soft colours and controlled contours support its tenderness. Smooth ears, stiff foreleg construction, limited surface texture and uncertain seed contact keep the execution below intricate illustration quality.

Qwen3.8-Flash

A coherent, appealing fantasy illustration with disciplined framing, luminous teal accents and consistent ornament. Most requested elements are clearly present. The bear-like facial proportions, lowered resting hand, obscured bent-leg construction and limited fabric modeling constrain likeness and anatomical clarity; glow effects are attractive but weakly integrated with surrounding surfaces.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Flash
Task & likeness7.5/108.0/10
Anatomy & construction7.0/107.0/10
Space & placement7.5/108.0/10
Light & reflections7.0/107.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/108.0/10
Artistry & character6.5/107.5/10
Materials & effects6.5/107.5/10
Visual integrity8.0/108.5/10

Benchmark task

Muse Wonder

A small elephant protecting a delicate seed tests expressive anatomy, physical contact and contrasting organic materials.

Qwen3.8-Flash

A floating capybara in ornate robes tests character anatomy, layered fabric and the placement of surrounding luminous forms.

Mona Lisa

Different task instructions

Precise visual recall and portrait reconstruction.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A competent illustrative interpretation with controlled curves, readable details and coherent depth layers. Facial, hair and garment shading demonstrate more development than basic construction. Replication remains limited by the frontal pose, elongated face and pronounced smile; crowded fingers, weak contact shadows and smooth materials constrain anatomical and painterly conviction.

Qwen3.8-Flash

The dark dress, crossed hands and hazy landscape evoke the Mona Lisa, but replication is limited by a generic frontal face, coarse smile and poorly articulated fingers. The gold frame has clearer definition than the portrait. Heavy mottling obscures features, while soft shading provides some volume without convincing anatomical detail.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Flash
Task & likeness5.5/105.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/104.5/10
Space & placement5.5/105.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail5.5/105.5/10
Artistry & character5.5/105.5/10
Materials & effects5.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity6.5/105.5/10

Benchmark task

An SVG interpretation of the Mona Lisa tests facial likeness, anatomy and the composition of a familiar portrait.

Beach

Different task instructions

Creativity, perspective and visual beauty.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A lively beach illustration with expressive animals, controlled colour transitions and unusually readable accessories. Connected graphic forms make the activities recognizable. Crowded overlaps, compressed depth, schematic joints, weak directional shadows and limited material variation constrain its physical coherence and refinement.

Qwen3.8-Flash

Sweeping palms, coordinated sunset colors and a central reflection create an expressive beach composition with clear depth. Birds, animals and varied activities thoroughly realize the brief. Small figures and animal anatomy remain rudimentary, water movement is schematic, and contact shadows are weak. Scattered foreground details and the clipped orange disk limit the finish.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Flash
Task & likeness8.5/109.0/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/107.0/10
Space & placement6.5/108.0/10
Light & reflections6.5/107.5/10
Purposeful detail9.0/108.5/10
Artistry & character7.0/108.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/106.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A busy shoreline at sunset tests scene composition, animal forms and the relationship between light and water reflections.

Ground Truth

Same task instructions

Physical reasoning, light and visual reconstruction.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Qwen3.8-Flash

This benchmark has not been assessed yet.

Benchmark task

A plank, computer mouse and blueberry in a steel room test physical stability, spatial relationships, materials and lighting.

Raccoon

Different task instructions

Scene composition and interacting subjects.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

An expressive, coherent cartoon demonstrates the requested riding and steering interaction. Clean contours, differentiated accessories and energetic spray support its appeal. Concealed seated contacts, compressed vehicle perspective and weak directional lighting limit physical resolution despite the detailed presentation.

Qwen3.8-Flash

The raccoon clearly rides the dog's back, with expressive features and appealing blue-orange color contrast. The dog's paws do not clearly operate connected controls, and the shallow vehicle lacks convincing jet ski construction. Clean outlines support the cartoon style, but generic shading and blurred water streaks limit depth and motion.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Flash
Task & likeness7.5/107.0/10
Anatomy & construction5.5/105.5/10
Space & placement6.5/106.5/10
Light & reflections4.5/105.5/10
Purposeful detail7.5/107.0/10
Artistry & character5.5/106.5/10
Materials & effects7.0/105.5/10
Visual integrity7.0/107.0/10

Benchmark task

A jet-ski scene pairs a canine driver with a raccoon passenger. It tests the placement and contact of interacting subjects, along with vehicle construction.

Pelican

Different task instructions

Subject construction and spatial relationships.

The judgment

Muse Wonder

A controlled, expressive seaside illustration with a distinctive pelican, coherent bicycle geometry and successfully resolved graphic detail. Visible pedal support and plausible occlusion strengthen the riding construction. Aligned wheels and layered scenery establish placement. Limited cast shadows, simplified leg articulation and restrained material modeling constrain its physical finish.

Qwen3.8-Flash

The pelican's expressive face, oversized bill and flowing scarf create an appealing focal point. The bicycle has recognizable frame, chain and wheel construction, but the far foot lacks a clear pedal connection and the wing's steering contact is ambiguous. Clean contours and gentle gradients support the illustration; simplified volume and weak directional shadows limit depth.

Score breakdown

CategoryMuse WonderQwen3.8-Flash
Task & likeness8.5/108.5/10
Anatomy & construction6.0/108.0/10
Space & placement7.5/107.5/10
Light & reflections5.5/106.5/10
Purposeful detail8.5/108.0/10
Artistry & character7.5/108.0/10
Materials & effects6.0/107.0/10
Visual integrity8.0/107.5/10

Benchmark task

A cycling pelican tests anatomy, riding posture and contact between the bird and the bicycle.